Have you tries fixed speed/duplex?
alexpalias-bsd...@yahoo.com wrote:
Good day
I'm running a FreeBSD 7.2 router and I am seeing a lot of input errors on one
of the em interfaces (em0), coupled with (at approximately the same times) much
fewer errors on em1 and em2. Monitoring is done with SN
Nothing actually special. They are one of few 10GbE expansion cards
supported on IBM blade servers.
See http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/technotes/tips0688.pdf
Barney Cordoba wrote:
--- On Sun, 7/19/09, Hooman Fazaeli wrote:
From: Hooman Fazaeli
Subject: broadcom 57710 support
To: freebsd
Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 12:52:53PM +0430, H.Fazaeli wrote:
Is there any near plan to develop drivers for
network cards based on broadcom NetXtereme II 57710
10 GbE controller?
Do you plan to help somehow with driver development?
No. I just plan to use
Is there any near plan to develop drivers for
network cards based on broadcom NetXtereme II 57710
10 GbE controller?
--
Best regards.
Hooman Fazaeli
Sepehr S. T. Co. Ltd.
Web: http://www.sepehrs.com
Tel: (9821)88975701-2
Fax: (9821)88983352
Is there any near plan to develop drivers for
network cards based on broadcom NetXtereme II 57710
10 GbE controller?
--
Best regards.
Hooman Fazaeli
Sepehr S. T. Co. Ltd.
Web: http://www.sepehrs.com
Tel: (9821)88975701-2
Fax: (9821)88983352
_
Dear Jack
Can you please comment on below statements ?!
Is the assertion true for all OSes (windows, linux, ...) or it
is just freebsd? I am actually concerned in how much production
ready is igb drivers in your opinion.
As a matter of fact, We have been (and are) using em driver
with different
hardwares?
It seems quite wrong, don't you agree?
And how come the unit number is given an arbitrary value? Is there a good
reason for that?
Yony
_
From: H.fazaeli [mailto:faza...@sepehrs.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 10:26 AM
To: Yony Yo
ifconfig fastEthernet0 192.168.1.0/24
Yony Yossef wrote:
-Original Message-
From: H.fazaeli [[1]mailto:faza...@sepehrs.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 6:24 PM
To: Yony Yossef
Cc: [2]freebsd-...@freebsd.org; [3]freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org;
Eitan Shefi; Oleg Kats; Liran
you may not change unit numbers as they are strictly controlled by kernel.
However, on freebsd 5.3+, you may use 'ifconfig name '
to achieve the same affect
Yony Yossef wrote:
Hi,
I would like to determine the unit number of my network cards, e.g.
make the device on pci0:16 be assigned every
Hi all and Jack
Are the changes discussed in:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2008-January/016584.html
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2007-August/014959.html
incorporated into em(4)?
If not, is there any near plans to do so?
--
Best regards.
Hooman Fazaeli <[
Jay L. T. Cornwall wrote:
H.fazaeli wrote:
The bridge works as it should: It receives packets from
XX.XX.XXX.YYY on the interface connected to the switch, and
forwards them on the interface connected to the gateway.
The problem is that forwarding between subnets is the responsibility
of
The bridge works as it should: It receives packets from
XX.XX.XXX.YYY on the interface connected to the switch, and
forwards them on the interface connected to the gateway.
The problem is that forwarding between subnets is the responsibility
of your switch. The switch does its job, but since the
Hi all
Where are 'those numbers' you are referring to? have I missed some message
in the thread?
Tiffany Snyder wrote:
Hi Andre,
are those numbers for small (64 bytes) packets? Good job on pushing
the base numbers higher on the same HW.
What piqued my attention was the note th
What about "routing zone" or "forwarding zone" which may be
abbreviated as "rtzone" or "fwdzone".
Julian Elischer wrote:
So, I'm playing with some multiple routing table support..
the first version is a minimal impact version with very limited
functionality.
It's done that way so I can put it i
14 matches
Mail list logo
