RE: [PATCH] pf(4) patch from OpenBSD 4.5

2010-10-24 Thread Greg Hennessy
s/CURRENT/HEAD/ below, wasn't quite awake yet when I sent it. :-) > -Original Message- > From: owner-freebsd...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > p...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Greg Hennessy > Sent: 24 October 2010 10:26 AM > To: Max Laier; Ermal Luçi > C

RE: [PATCH] pf(4) patch from OpenBSD 4.5

2010-10-24 Thread Greg Hennessy
It doesn't appear to patch cleanly against CURRENT gw2:/usr/src # find . -name \*.rej ./contrib/pf/pfctl/pfctl_table.c.rej ./contrib/pf/pfctl/parse.y.rej ./contrib/pf/pfctl/pfctl.c.rej ./contrib/pf/pfctl/pfctl_parser.h.rej ./contrib/pf/pfctl/pfctl.8.rej ./contrib/pf/pfctl/pfctl.h.rej ./sys/contrib

Re: PF + BRIDGE + PFSYNC causes system freezing

2010-03-17 Thread Greg Hennessy
My bad, that'll teach me to reply in haste :-) Sent using BlackBerry® from Orange -Original Message- From: Giulio Ferro Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:37:31 To: Greg Hennessy Cc: Daniel Hartmeier; freebsd-net@freebsd.org; freebsd...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PF + BRIDGE + PFSYNC c

RE: PF + BRIDGE + PFSYNC causes system freezing

2010-03-17 Thread Greg Hennessy
A possible corner case with the virtual hosting platform ? Try changing the NICS from EM to something else supported RL on vmware IIRC. Greg From: owner-freebsd...@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Giulio Ferro [au...@zirakzigil.

RE: PF NAT LOG

2007-02-09 Thread Greg Hennessy
> > I need to record logs of all connections nated from PF, has some way? > Tag the nat rule and then apply that tag to an egress rule of the form pass out log quick on blah tagged natted Greg -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7

RE: Nat Log

2007-02-05 Thread Greg Hennessy
> > It is possible to record logs of all connections nated with the PF? > Already tried to use "nat log on...", without success. > The version of PF used in FreeBSD (OpenBSD rev 3.7 I believe) doesn't have the log option for either nat pass or rdr pass. That facility came in later versions of

RE: Carp Suppression

2005-06-13 Thread Greg Hennessy
> The reason we are using CARP on a PLIP interface is to allow > us to have redundant connections between 2 transparent > bridging firewalls. CARP is not going to work with a layer 2 firewall. > Instead of sending packets over our network, we isolate them > onto a PLIP interface and crosso