On 2003-10-20, Tobias P. Santos wrote:
> I am trying to boot a FreeBSD diskless client with no success.
> Actually, I can boot the client, the kernel is downloaded and begins
> to boot. Then it tries to reach the DHCP/BOOT server, but this never
> occurs and the machine repeats the following messa
[Note: Cc list trimmed; cross-posting not recommended; please
watch these things.]
Rostislav Krasny wrote:
| Maybe PPPoE implementation in FreeBSD have a bug?
The data you have provided is inadequate. The following
/etc/ppp.conf (edited to hide passwords, etc) works with the
version of p
Mike Silbersack wrote:
| On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Greg Black wrote:
|
| > Josef Karthauser wrote:
| >
| > | 4.3 is two whole major releases ago. You should be running 4.5, which
| > | you can get by cvsuping using the tag RELENG_4_5_0_RELEASE, or the tag
| > | RELENG_4 if you wi
Josef Karthauser wrote:
| > I like to understand the problem, before upgrading out of it. This
| > is the 28th patch of REL ENG 4.3 after all. It should be very stable.
|
| 4.3 is two whole major releases ago. You should be running 4.5, which
| you can get by cvsuping using the tag RELENG_4_5_0
Greg Black wrote:
| Brian Somers wrote:
|
| [lots of early history of this thread snipped]
|
| | > | > > | What version of FreeBSD are you using? The ppp included in early 4.x
| | > | > > | distributions doesn't have the TCP MSS fixup code that is require
Brian Somers wrote:
[lots of early history of this thread snipped]
| > | > > | What version of FreeBSD are you using? The ppp included in early 4.x
| > | > > | distributions doesn't have the TCP MSS fixup code that is required to
| > | > > | make
| > | > > | things work properly with a PPPoE co
Brian Somers wrote:
| > > "Matthew Emmerton" wrote:
| > > | From: "Greg Black" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > > | To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > > | Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 10:39 PM
| > > | Subject: ppp -nat fails with adsl, but ok wi
Greg Black wrote:
| "Matthew Emmerton" wrote:
|
| | > | > I've had ppp -nat working just fine over a normal modem link,
| | > | > but it is not working at all well on my ADSL link to the same
| | > | > provider.
| | > | >
| | > | > To quantify "
"Matthew Emmerton" wrote:
| > | > I've had ppp -nat working just fine over a normal modem link,
| > | > but it is not working at all well on my ADSL link to the same
| > | > provider.
| > | >
| > | > To quantify "not working at all well", although I can ping and
| > | > traceroute ok from the hos
"Matthew Emmerton" wrote:
| From: "Greg Black" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 10:39 PM
| Subject: ppp -nat fails with adsl, but ok with modem
|
| > I've had ppp -nat working just fine over a normal mode
if anybody can suggest steps I could take to
identify the nature of the problem, that would also be most
welcome.
Greg Black
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Julian Elischer wrote:
| > I took the easy way out here and just ran
| >
| > ifconfig xl0 inet 10.0.0.1
|
| Why put an IP address on it?
|
| ifconfig xl0 up
I left out a detail. The modem has its own 10.x.x.x address and
I was killing two birds with one stone -- this makes it easy to
ta
"Thor Legvold" wrote:
| Well, I've asked 3 or 4 times now in the last 3 weeks, and haven't received
| any answers. Posted to comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc and to both questions- and
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| That leads me to conclude that either I'm: asking the wrong question(s),
| asking in an im
Brian Somers wrote:
| > Dynamic loading of negraph modules is still broken, and probably won't be
| > fixed until 5.0 (at least that's what the comments on the zillion PRs
| > about this problem say.)
| >
| > Add 'options NETGRAPH_ETHER' and 'options NEGRAPH_SOCKET' to your kernel
| > config fil
I rebuilt my 4.2-RELEASE kernel that has been in use for ages
with the following extra lines in the config:
options NETGRAPH#netgraph(4) system
options NETGRAPH_PPPOE
My earlier attempt to run ppp(8) on my new ADSL modem failed
because netgraph was not in the kern
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| >at least we'd get rid of the d*mned warning messages!
| >Are you not aware that most of the warning messages for a normal
| >kernel compile come from the KAME code? I am on compile number 157
| >for the KSE code. (in 3 weeks)
|
| though i have no freebsd-curre
Jean-Christophe Varaillon wrote:
> If a "dmesg | grep fxp2" does not show any messages at all, does it means
> that the interface is not existing ?
No, try: grep fxp2 /var/run/dmesg.boot
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Mitch Collinsworth wrote:
> > Is it just a really bad idea?
>
> It's an interesting idea, but it assumes a picture of the world that
> doesn't correspond with actual reality.
The expression "actual reality" should be read as "the BIND way
of doing things". There are alternative DNS implementa
18 matches
Mail list logo
