On Mon, 15 Apr 2013 12:15:49 -0700, Cy Schubert
wrote:
> It was pointed out to me that Darren Reed has changed licenses from
> his IP Filter license that's been in IPF since 2005 or so, when he
> joined Sun, to GPLv2 (probably when Darren left when Oracle took over
> Sun). Given that IPF already
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:00:40 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> I haven't reviewed the patch in detail yet but I wanted to first thank
> you for taking on this work, and being so responsive to Fernando's
> request (which I agreed with, and you updated before I even had a
> chance to say so). :)
Thanks f
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:39:23 + (UTC), "Bjoern A. Zeeb"
wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>> Before I am going to remove the initializations I made the two
>> rip{,6}_output functions calling panic().
>>
>> I have a patch for HEAD here:
>> http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/200901
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 06:34:13 GMT, Qing Li wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The arp-v2 changes have been committed into HEAD.
> Please report problems to me and Kip Macy.
Thanks! I've just updated my installation here to the new kernel and
userland and it seems to work fine so far. At least, ARP and IPv4 se
Hi Julian.
Has anyone else tested this patch? I'm going to have a bit of time to
try reproducing this again in the following days. Is this patch version
the last one you have written? Should I patch with this one and give it
a try?
FWIW, reading through this version of rt_check_fib() is nicer,
On 2008-02-26 11:51, ithilgore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>> I don't see ucp[] in RELENG_6, RELENG_7 or CURRENT. Where did you get
>> the version shown as `7.0-RC1' above?
>
> I got the source code from the ftp.freebsd.org and I jus
On 2008-02-23 02:37, ithilgore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>ithilgore wrote:
>> I was looking at the differences between some old FreeBSD code
>> and the one of 7.0-RC1 and was wondering about a change
>> in inet_ntoa.c
>>
>> /* 7.0-RC1 **/
>>
>>sprintf(buf, "%d.%d.%d.%d",
>>
On 2008-01-11 03:19, Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Lawrence Stewart wrote:
>>> I've got a rewritten and much more efficient tcp_reass() function in
>>> my local tree. I'll import it into Perforce next week with all the
>>> other stuff. You may want to base your auto-sizing work on i
On 2007-10-19 10:48, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay. libpcap 0.9.8 and tcpdump 3.9.8 are now imported into HEAD and
> RELENG_7. Is anyone eager to pull it down to RELENG_6 as well,
> because I don't have the resources available at the moment. The
> update was crucial to me in HEAD a
On 2007-09-17 10:45, Tom Judge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>>On 2007-09-10 14:05, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>On 2007-09-10 02:03, Nuno Antunes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>> Tom Judge wrote
On 2007-09-12 10:58, tekkie140 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> no response in the freebsd-questions forum...maybe here?
>
> hi - all of a sudden (it used to work) i can't start the ftpd daemon.
>
> # /usr/libexec/ftpd -l -R -p ftpd-id
> Sept 10 09:02:22 myhostname ftpd[1234]: getpeername (/usr/libex
On 2007-09-10 14:05, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-09-10 02:03, Nuno Antunes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Tom Judge wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>> While making some changes to the routing table on one of our routers
On 2007-09-10 02:03, Nuno Antunes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Tom Judge wrote:
Hi,
While making some changes to the routing table on one of our routers
today I noticed that "route add" was showing some strange
behaviour. When adding a route for 128/8 to the table rather than
On 2007-09-07 16:57, "Bruce M. Simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tom Judge wrote:
>> Hi,
>> While making some changes to the routing table on one of our routers
>> today I noticed that "route add" was showing some strange
>> behaviour. When adding a route for 128/8 to the table rather than
>> a
On 2007-03-20 14:00, John Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 10:40:51AM +0300, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> > > Doing a grep for locking in /usr/src/share/man/man9/Makefile
> > > produce nothing.
> >
> > But if you're running -CURRENT, then you can view the page from the
> > sour
On 2006-06-16 12:02, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David DeSimone wrote:
> > I ran into the same thing when analyzing the handbook's examples, and
> > quickly abandoned the handbook when writing my own configs.
>
> Those who are more knowledgeable on this topic might want to
> consider w
On 2006-04-13 12:12, Sam Leffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>>On 2006-04-13 20:19, Nik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>Try to use the drivers from the http://madwifi.org/ project.
>>>Your card has a Wireless LAN chipset from Athero
On 2006-04-13 20:19, Nik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try to use the drivers from the http://madwifi.org/ project.
> Your card has a Wireless LAN chipset from Atheros, that's why
> it is not supported by prism drivers.
FWIW,
A DWL-AG650 (HW ver: B2) works fine with `if_ath' on CURRENT here.
I'm n
On 2006-03-20 12:51, Ludovit Koren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I realized on several different versions of FreeBSD including
> 5.4-STABLE, when using static routes to specific subnets and the WAN
> link goes down for unpredictable reasons, the server gets ICMP
> redirect message and rear
On 2006-02-03 04:22, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2006-01-30 11:39, Julien Gabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> I filled one a year ago, for the very same problem (encountered for two
> >>> years now). See Problem Report kern/80005 fo
On 2006-02-03 11:09, Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 04:22:04AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>>On 2006-01-30 11:39, Julien Gabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I don't really know if there is a PCI or PCMCIA version of this
On 2006-01-30 11:39, Julien Gabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I filled one a year ago, for the very same problem (encountered for two
>>> years now). See Problem Report kern/80005 for more information. I
>>> think that another user (Emmanuel Duros) tried to speak with Realtek on
>>> that point
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Your interface only has an IPv6 address. Is that expected? How
> > are you bringing up the an0 interface?
> >
> > For instance, my /root/netstart-home.sh script contains (among a
> > few
On 2005-11-26 23:58, Imrani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to configure Cisco Aironet 350 wireless PCI card but I get
> an error which I am unable to find much details for that. Following is
> description of ifconfing:
>
> > ifconfig an0
> an0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> inet
On 2005-11-04 11:14, Sergey Babkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>On 2005-11-03 22:56, kamal kc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> since i am using the adaptive LZW compression scheme it
>>> requires con
On 2005-11-03 22:56, kamal kc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> for my compression/decompression i use string tables and
>>> temporary buffers which take about 14KB of memory per
>>> packet.
>>
>> If you're allocating 14 KB of data just to send
>> (approximately) 1.4 KB
>> and then you throw away the
On 2005-11-02 18:39, kamal kc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dear everybody,
>
> i am trying to compress/decompress ip packets.
> for this i have implemented the adaptive lzw compression.
> i put the code in the ip_output.c and do my compression/decompression
> just before the if_output() function ca
On 2005-10-23 22:27, kamal kc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> one thing i would like to ask?
>
> does it make any difference if i free the mbuf 'm' passed to
> if_output() and pass my own mbuf to if_output.
>
> is the original mbuf referenced by any other pointers or global
> variables ??
If you are
On 2005-10-23 04:13, kamal kc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> /* the argument m is the (struct mbuf *) that
> * contains the packet data
> */
>
> void copy_the_memorybuffer(struct mbuf **m)
> {
>struct mbuf *mbuf_pointer=*m;
>struct mbuf **next_packet;
>
>next_packet=&mbuf_pointer;
>
>
On 2005-10-23 01:30, kamal kc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i come across this unusual problem.
>
> i changed the ip_tos field of the struct ip and computed the checksum
> by using in_cksum().
>
> when the packet uses only one mbuf the computed checksum is ok but
> when the packet uses more than one
On 2005-07-12 17:55, Roman Kurakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is it possible that flood ping hits an icmp rate-limiting watermark
>> and then every subsequent icmp packet gets penalized with a delay
>> until a fair amount of time passes?
> Wasn't observed on ethernet iface. But this is good ide
On 2005-07-12 16:38, Roman Kurakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>I am starting to investigate some net problem and I wonder if this
> problem seen/known.
>The problem was observed with ce(4) (Cronyx Tau32-PCI/Lite,
> it is not in the tree yet, but similar to cp(4)/ctau(4) devices) an
On 2005-06-08 12:40, Jeremie Le Hen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> IIRC,
> - Linux uses the ipip module to do IP-over-IP tunnel
> - FreeBSD uses the gre(4) interface to do GRE tunnels
> - GRE is a Cisco product and means ``Generic Routing
> Encapsulation''. I don't know what the
On 2005-06-07 11:27, Christian Kuhtz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using the DIVERT socket API for a proof of concept lab setup here,
> and I could use some help..
>
> Two boxes are involved, packets traverse both in series. The first one,
> lets call her A, is taking the UDP packet off the wir
On 2005-05-08 19:22, Michael Bretterklieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Max Laier wrote:
>>On Sunday 08 May 2005 18:54, Michael Bretterklieber wrote:
>>> it looks like that under 5-stable it's allowed to have different
>>> interfaces with the same IP, bug or feature?
>>
>> Feature and required for
On 2005-04-27 14:29, Shyam Shantikumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear All,
> I am getting the following errors when I run /usr/sbin/named
>
> Named[1398]: could not listen on UDP socket: address in use
> Named[1398]: creating IPv4 interface lo0 failed; interface ignored
> Named[1398] dns_rdata_f
On 2005-03-21 14:05, Patrik Arlos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to send 'raw' Ethernet frames. I have however not found any
> examples of how to do this in BSD.
>
> Is it possible to open a 'ethernet' socket, similar to a AF_INET? I
> need to be able to control the destination address an
On 2005-03-06 13:05, Andreas Bachmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > AFAIK, this can only be done if the original process calls execve() on a
> > setuid binary and has not marked the socket descriptor as close-on-exec.
>
> i'm developing a gtk+ based equivalent to 'sockstat'.
> when a user is propo
On 2005-03-06 12:04, Andreas Bachmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> can a socket, which created by a user over a process (xfile.xf_uid,
> xfile.xf_pid), suddenly have another user or another process (maybee
> with setuid() or fork()) or does the socket clone?
AFAIK, this can only be done if the ori
On 2005-01-10 11:26, Len Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Just off the top of my head...
>>
>> You mentioned the freebsd machine is the gateway. Do you have a
>> firewall on the host blocking connections from the windows machine?
>
> a forgotten detail is that the windows machine sends just fi
On 2004-12-06 15:32, Gerald Heinig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've run into a possible bug in ping(8) while investigating a strange
> duplicate packet effect in our driver.
> The effect shows up on other drivers and I believe it's due to a counter
> overflow in ping.
> Basically, leav
On 2004-10-18 11:01, Aleksandr Milewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apologies if this is in a FAQ (or worse, I'm posting to the wrong list).
> *BSD is somewhat new to me as most of my *nix experience is with that
> Finnish OS. :)
>
> Having reached my wits end with NISTnet/netem, I'm trying to bu
On 2004-10-16 18:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Here is a proposed set of diffs for locking fixes in the
> scope6.c module. Please let me know anyone has questions or
> comments.
>
> Thanks,
> George
I'm not a networking expert, but there are some style bugs you might
On 2004-10-12 09:04, Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> > On 2004-10-11 16:31, Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > + * NOTE: Regarding access control. Raw sockets may only be created by
> > >
On 2004-10-11 16:31, Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> + * NOTE: Regarding access control. Raw sockets may only be created by
> + * privileged processes; however, as a result of jailed processes and the
> + * ability for processes to downgrade privilege yet retain a reference to the
> + *
On 2004-10-09 00:58, Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 11:51:17PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> G> Not really. Just trying to see if there _was_ any packet loss first.
> G> After running for several hours, the counters are still zero. I
On 2004-10-09 00:34, Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 06:15:15PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> G> In ether_input() we unconditionaly discard the mbufs whose m_len is less than
> G> ETHER_HDR_LEN. A bit higher M_PKTHDR has been checked b
In ether_input() we unconditionaly discard the mbufs whose m_len is less than
ETHER_HDR_LEN. A bit higher M_PKTHDR has been checked but the check made
before discarding the frame doesn't pay attention to the m->m_pkthdr.len (the
total packet length).
I am trying to find out how often this happens
On 2004-06-09 11:20, Danny Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anyone direct me to a good tutorial on ipf / ipnat? Specifically
> I need to open a contiguous range of ports with ipf & then forward
> them (rdr?) to an internal IP address with ipnat.
The first is easy to set up if you look at th
On 2003-02-16 01:54, Matthew Jonkman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # ifconfig
> rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> inet XXX.XXX.44.91 netmask 0xfff8 broadcast XXX.XXX.44.95
> ether 00:05:5d:32:c6:9c
> media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP)
> status: active
> rl1: flags
On 2003-02-10 14:59, Matthew Jonkman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't add more than one alias to an interface on a new install of
> 5.0-rel.
>
> I have tried specifying every possible detail of the alias but no
> change, just get this:
>
> ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): File exists
>
> The firs
On 2003-01-02 16:40, Olivier Cherrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the ipfw man page, we can read:
> "To ease configuration, rules can be put into a file which is processed
> using ipfw as shown in the first synopsis line."
>
> Shouldn't be the 'last synopsis line' ?
You're right of course. I
On 2002-11-23 19:31, Vincent Goupil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently, this is the output. I don't have one when it happen. I will
> try to provide one.
>
> [root@wally ~] netstat -m
> 514/608/6016 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
>514 mbufs allocated to data
> 512/584/1504 mbuf cl
On 2002-11-23 00:28, Vincent Goupil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I run FreeBSD 4.6.2 as a Firewall with ipfilter 3.4.27.
> I have 4 3C905. I currently have "network slowdown" during peak hours:
> packets are being dropped by the firewall, I get timeouts with mail and
> web, I ping interfaces but I
On 2002-10-15 00:12, Nicolas Christin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> > > Would people be open to renaming the 'MSIZE' kernel option to something
> > > more specific such as 'MBUF_SIZE' or 'MBUFSIZE'? Using 'MSIZE' can
> >
> > No.
> >
> > MSIZE is a tr
On 2002-10-11 14:57, soheil hassas yeganeh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To recompute the checksum of the ip packets i wrote this lines in
> the ip_input.c files :
>
>ip->ip_sum =0 ;
>if(hlen == sizeof(struct ip))
>ip->ip_sum = in_cksum_hdr(ip);
>else
>
On 2002-07-12 07:45 +, Bosko Milekic wrote:
> The jist of the problem is that when you want to say, remove yourself
> from the list, you have to:
>
> 1) your "next"'s back pointer to your "back" pointer
> 2) your "Prev"'s next pointer to your "next" pointer
>
> So that's two operations but for
On 2002-07-11 17:12 +, Bosko Milekic wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 01:56:08PM -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > example: userland does an 8KB write, in the old case this requires
> > 4 clusters, with the new one you end up using 4 clusters and stuff
> > the remaining 16 bytes in a regular mbuf,
On 2002-06-24 12:56 +, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 10:33:05AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > I submitted some patches to use sendfile(2) that weren't accepted
> > for some reason. It's not too hard, you just have to adjust the code
> > not to close(2) the descriptors an
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Lars Fredriksen wrote:
> Lars Cameron Haegle wrote:
>
> > I come from the Windoze side of the playground, where you are able to
> > rename the Administrator account name, in order to provide a bit more
> > security. Can a similar thing be done with FreeBSD? Cam
>
> Hi cameron
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 09:49:03AM -0700, Orville R. Weyrich.Jr wrote:
> If the previously open-licensed source code has developed a more
> restrictive license, that does not prevent free use of the old source
> code, does it? Rather than throwing the whole thing out, would not the
> proper resp
61 matches
Mail list logo
