Andre Oppermann wrote:
> We have a SYN cookie implementation for quite some time now but it
> has some limitations with current realities for window scaling and
> SACK encoding the in the few available bits.
>
> This patch updates and improves SYN cookies mainly by:
>
> a) encoding of MSS, WS
Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 05.11.2012 11:09, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > Andre Oppermann wrote:
> >
> >> I've backed out the change with r242601 as it exhibits still too
> >> many problems. I'll fix these problems in the next days but in
> >
Andre Oppermann wrote:
> I've backed out the change with r242601 as it exhibits still too
> many problems. I'll fix these problems in the next days but in
> the mean time HEAD should be in a working state.
>
> I'll be grateful if I could send you the fixed change for testing
> before it goes in
Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 04.11.2012 22:52, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > Andre Oppermann wrote:
> >> The patch I sent was not correct. Please try this new attached patch
> >> instead.
> >
> > This seems to fix the issue for connections between curl and gatl
Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 04.11.2012 13:29, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > Andre Oppermann wrote:
> >
> >> thank you for the bug report. Please try the attached patch
> >> which should fix the issue you observed.
> >
> > Thanks for the patch, Andr
Andre Oppermann wrote:
> thank you for the bug report. Please try the attached patch
> which should fix the issue you observed.
Thanks for the patch, Andre.
It seems to make the transfers 100% reliably again,
but they are frequently very slow:
fk@r500 ~ $i=1; while curl -o /dev/zero 'http://1
"Ronald F. Guilmette" wrote:
> After the kldload, I got message showing me the various data rates
> available for 801.11a, 802.11b, and 802.11g... up to 54Mbps on that
> last one, of course.
>
> However as I understand it, the Intel 5100 chip is also capable of
> 802.11n, and furthermore and add
Max Laier wrote:
> C'mon ... where are the testers at?
>
> On 18.10.2010 11:10, Ermal Luçi wrote:
> > Feedback is very welcome.
>
> Is there no-one testing Ermal's exciting patch? Let's help getting this
> tested ... before we put it into SVN!
>
> fetch http://people.freebsd.org/~eri/pf45_1.
Jeff Roberson wrote:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/mbuf2.diff
> This is a call for testers and feedback on my mbuf layout improvements.
> I'm trying to decide whether I will push to have these included in 8.0.
> After reducing the scope slightly from my last patch, I have not
> encountere
Jeff Roberson wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Feb 2009, Fabian Keil wrote:
>
> > Jeff Roberson wrote:
> >> I have updated the patch here:
> >>
> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/mbuf_ref2.diff
> >>
> >> This resolves the !INVARIANTS bug and improv
Jeff Roberson wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Fabian Keil wrote:
>
> > Fabian Keil wrote:
> >
> >> Jeff Roberson wrote:
> >>
> >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/mbuf_ref2.diff
> >>
> >>> I have been experimenting with
Jeff Roberson wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Fabian Keil wrote:
>
> > Fabian Keil wrote:
> >
> >> Jeff Roberson wrote:
> >>
> >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/mbuf_ref2.diff
> >>
> >>> I have been experimenting with
Fabian Keil wrote:
> Jeff Roberson wrote:
>
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/mbuf_ref2.diff
>
> > I have been experimenting with different revisions to the mbuf api to
> > improve performance and simplify code. This patch is the first of
> > several p
Jeff Roberson wrote:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/mbuf_ref2.diff
> I have been experimenting with different revisions to the mbuf api to
> improve performance and simplify code. This patch is the first of
> several proposed steps towards those goals. The aim of this patch is
> two fold;
"Verbeek, Maarten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'm busy creating a a http-proxy server/router with FreeBSD 6.2, but
> somewhere along the line i'm doing things wrong i think.
What exactly did you do so far and how is it failing?
> situation: network 172.45.x.x/12 -FREEBSD ROUTER -
> 1
Chris Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see this question come up now and then on the lists, so, I'll share
> what I've learned about natd and performance! First, if your running
> natd on a processor which supports more functions than just a standard
> 386, ie a Pentium, Athlon, etc.
Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 10 April 2006 14:32, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> > > On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 19:56:34 +0200
> > > Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > max> Updated version here:
> > max> http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/new_iwi/20060409.both_nofw.tgz
>
> Latest
Erik Trulsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 04:41:42PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > I tried if_bridge to let QEMU on my laptop talk to the wireless
> > network. It worked if the Laptop's NIC was in ad-hoc or hostap mode,
> > but faile
Sten Daniel Sørsdal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fabian Keil wrote:
>
> > The example section has the following sentence "Such a con-
> > figuration could be used to implement a simple 802.11-to-Ethernet bridge
> > (assuming the 802.11 interface is in ad-h
Andrew Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 11:53:52AM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > "Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Friday 14 April 2006 21:37, Fabian Keil wrote:
> >
> >
"Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 14 April 2006 21:37, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > Depending on your firewall setup you might have to disable
> > some of the net.link.bridge sysctls as well.
>
> I don't have any firewalls in the k
"Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to use if_bridge with OpenVPN and I am having some
> trouble with basic bridging.
>
> I am testing it on my laptop with has an ath interface which uses WPA
> to a Linksys WRT54G and then to a FreeBSD gateway.
>
> I have tried both config
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a problem setting up Intel PRO / Wireless 2200BG on Asus
> A3500N machine running FreeBSD 6.0. I tried to follow instructions
> at http://damien.bergamini.free.fr/ipw/ipw-freebsd.html but they are
> ok up till some point. I've installed iwi-firmware as needed an
Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 10 April 2006 19:00, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > Hajimu UMEMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > New iwi driver loads firmware automatically. You need to install
> > > ports/net/iwi-firmware-kmod instead of p
Hajimu UMEMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 03:03:16 -0700
> > Ross Finlayson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> finlayson> #iwicontrol -i iwi0 -d /boot/firmware -m ibss
> finlayson> iwicontrol: Can't load firmware to driver: Invalid argument
>
> finlayson> (This worked
Wesley Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
>
> > Wesley Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Has anyone been successful with one of these cards and the
> >> ndisulator? I can get the wrapper to att
Wesley Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone been successful with one of these cards and the
> ndisulator? I can get the wrapper to attach the device, but it won't
> accept an SSID being assigned via ifconfig (or anything else for that
> matter), and wpa_supplicant also fails.
Try to set
lysergius2001 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know how to change channels on wireless cards using
> ndis0? I have tried "chan=" in ipfconfig and rc.con without
> success...
AFAIK you can't. Are you sure you really have to?
Normally the right channel is picked automatically.
Fabian
--
28 matches
Mail list logo
