I tested FreeBSD for another subject and found a bug:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165059#c9
What can be done about it?
Eliezer
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsu
affects packets that are being routed throw the FreeBSD
box and not regular sockets.*
An exact same issue was there in OpenBSD 5.7 and on current(5.8) it got
fixed.
Eliezer
On 27/08/2015 10:56, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
I added a filter rule to iptables with a INVALID reject match and any
packet
I added a filter rule to iptables with a INVALID reject match and any
packet that is being passed throw the FreeBSD router is being marked by
itpables as INVALID.
An example for an INVALID packet:
http://ngtech.co.il/nat_issue/proxy2.pcap
Eliezer
On 26/08/2015 21:24, Eliezer Croitoru wrote
Just wanted to make sure I understand the issue:
Snort is not utilizing from some reason the CPU by not threading or by
something else with the NIC configuration?
From my point of view Snort has to do the changes and not the OS, am I
misunderstanding something?
Thanks,
Eliezer
On 09/22/2014 1