correctness by looking at objdump.
--
Ed Schouten
WWW: http://80386.nl/
pgp6oMmrAIF7A.pgp
Description: PGP signature
* Julian Elischer wrote:
> Ed Schouten wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> It turns out Netgraph uses a language construct that is only allowed
>> with GCC, but not with LLVM. According to the specs, LLVM's behaviour is
>> correct. It is not allowed to do this:
>&g
but I think this is the
only way to do this safely. Diane and I also compared the output of
objdump and they seem to be equivalent, except for some reordering.
Objections before I commit this to SVN?
--
Ed Schouten
WWW: http://80386.nl/
pgpjvUBGUgMif.pgp
Description: PGP signature
* Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> got a p4 pointer?
Yes. It's just in //depot/projects/mpsafetty/..., just like where the
MPSAFE TTY code used to live.
--
Ed Schouten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
WWW: http://80386.nl/
pgp0H7hcpoTEP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I've already got a prototype
of the ttyhook interface stored at:
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~ed/mpsafetty/
The diffs as of August 21 should just apply on top of SVN. It includes a
patched snp(4).
Yours,
--
Ed Schouten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
WWW: http://80386.nl/
pgpEAQwDeR3mb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
the device drivers.
I still haven't had time to add the CAN_BYPASS_L_RINT functionality
back. I was thinking about adding the actual copying to the buffers
inside the TTY layer, which means we can finally remove all that
redundant code from the drivers.
But this is still on my TODO list. ;-)
-
w to guess which one we should use.
You could use the __FreeBSD_version definition to detect what version of
FreeBSD people are using. I guess it has been bumped after the IPSEC
import.
--
Ed Schouten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
WWW: http://g-rave.nl/
pgpmtpGBTzgye.pgp
Description: PGP signature
just compiled and installed a kernel with the new nfe(4) driver and
DEVICE_POLLING enabled. Below are the results of some scp(1) transfers:
stock nfe(4): 2.5 MB/sec
new nfe(4): 3.7 MB/sec
polling:4.1 MB/sec
The driver is a lot better than the stock nfe(4). Are there any plans to
add th
voila: it works.
I can now boot my Xbox without plugging around all the time. The
CRC/alignment errors have also vanished.
http://g-rave.nl/junk/freebsd-icsphy.diff
Yours,
--
Ed Schouten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
WWW: http://g-rave.nl/
pgpoBA5kMO1Nz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
init_rxcfg() function. I took a look at vge(4)
and xl(4) and added `re_if_flags` to the softc to backup the original
ifp->if_flags.
Yours,
--
Ed Schouten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
WWW: http://g-rave.nl/
--- sys/dev/re/if_re.c Sat Dec 2 00:05:44 2006
+++ sys/dev/re/if_re.c Sat Dec 2
ng the box. When I run tcpdump, the box doesn't freeze
and enters promiscuous mode (suddenly the ping6 starts to work then).
What do you think about this patch?
Yours,
--
Ed Schouten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
WWW: http://g-rave.nl/
--- sys/dev/re/if_re.c Fri Dec 1 17:01:48 2006
+++ sys
a lot. I still have some other minor issues with my
network interface by the way:
- Switching from and to promiscuous mode takes 7 seconds. All packets
are dropped in the mean time.
- Fetching 100 Mbit through FTP uses a lot of interrupts (almost
thousands).
Yours,
--
Ed Schouten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
WWW: http://g-rave.nl/
pgpFgqzKq48CX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
owing command:
$ ifconfig re0 promisc
Is this a known issue about these NICs?
Yours,
--
Ed Schouten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
WWW: http://g-rave.nl/
pgpaQTqUAU50B.pgp
Description: PGP signature
* JINMEI Tatuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could you try the patch attached below? It's for 6.1-RELEASE, but I
> guess it's pretty easy to apply to CURRENT.
I've applied it on my CURRENT box at home and it works. Hooray! :)
Yours,
--
Ed Schouten <[EMAIL PROT
t home:
| gif0: flags=8051 mtu 1280
| tunnel inet 83.181.147.170 --> 193.109.122.244
| inet6 fe80::202:a5ff:fe58:4927%gif0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x7
| inet6 2001:7b8:310::1 --> 2001:7b8:2ff:a4::1 prefixlen 128
As far as I know, the latest FreeBSD releases show an error messag
aling with point
to point devices, so I write a patch[2] for nd6_lookup() to make it
print the message when not dealing with IFF_POINTOPOINT devices.
Should I open a PR for this patch?
Yours,
--
Ed Schouten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
WWW: http://g-rave.nl/
[1] http://www.il.fontys.nl/
[2] http:
16 matches
Mail list logo
