On Nov 14, 2012, at 12:23 AM, Fernando Gont wrote:
> On 11/12/2012 02:57 PM, Dustin Wenz wrote:
>> I'm trying to determine why the default ephemeral port range appears
>> to be 1 through 65535 in at least 8.1 through 9.1RC.
>
> I had produced the patch that e
if I'm wrong but netinet/in_pcb.c:490 indicates this is the case.
>
> -Colin
>
> On 12 Nov 2012, at 17:57, Dustin Wenz wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to determine why the default ephemeral port range appears to be
>> 1 through 65535 in at least 8.1 through 9.1RC.
I'm trying to determine why the default ephemeral port range appears to be
1 through 65535 in at least 8.1 through 9.1RC. Documentation regarding the
lower bound on the range seems inconsistent. The FreeBSD website
(http://wiki.freebsd.org/SystemTuning) suggests that
net.inet.ip.portrange.f
