Hello!
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> 1. Has situation with this driver improved somehow (is somebody going to
>support it and commit into the CURRENT)?
>
I'm working on it. Unlike OpenBSD/NetBSD msk(4) my code is based on
sk(4) and myk(4) from Marvell. I've managed to send p
Hello!
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Nikolas Britton wrote:
Last I checked somebody was developing an experimental driver and
Marvell had just released the code to their FreeBSD 5.x/6.x driver:
mykbsd60x86-8.12.2.3.tar (bindary kmod package)
mykbsd60x86-8.12.1.3-src.tgz (source code)
I can confirm th
Hello!
Sorry for reposting my questions again, I hope they are interesting not
only for me...
What is the current status of the fast IP forwarding in RELENG_4 and in
modern versions (CURRENT/RELENG_6)? I see that this code (either ip_flow.*
in RELENG_4 or ip_fastfwd.c in RELENG_6) is always
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
a process to a network interface alias on the fly? So if you had ten
possible
Alas I don't see the way to bind an abstract process to the specific IP
address on hosts with several IPs. For applications which use connect(2),
...sho
Hello!
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Duane Whitty wrote:
Well, I think maybe your solution is the simplest and it sounds like an
interesting feature. I do wonder though if it would be possible to bind
a process to a network interface alias on the fly? So if you had ten possible
Alas I don't see th
Hello!
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006, Jack Vogel wrote:
Sure there is an interest, spare CPU cycles are never superfluous
in production environment! What hardware (NICs/chipsets) supports this
I/OAT DMA engine?
Its part of the Intel Blackford chipset, so for instance Supermicro has a
motherboard and s
Hello!
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Jack Vogel wrote:
We, myself and Prafulla Deuskar at Intel LAD, have a driver and stack
changes that support Intel's new I/OAT DMA hardware. This is a
DMA engine in the chipset. There is potential to use the hardware
We are hoping to get this code into CURRENT soon
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
# ipfw add 00100 count ip from { not 10.20.0.0/16 and not 10.30.0.0/16 } to
any via fxp0 in
ipfw: missing ")"
Correct, there is no 'and' keyword in ipfw syntax, since it's redundant:
a simple ',' in addre
Hello!
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Brian Candler wrote:
Firstly, "from any XXX" is giving two different 'from' items. I guess you
meant "from not { 10.20.0.0/16 or 10.30.0.0/16 }". But that doesn't work
either:
# ipfw add 00100 count ip from not { 10.20.0.0/16 or 10.30.0.0/16 } to any
via fxp0 in
i
Hello!
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Sten Daniel S?rsdal wrote:
In RELENG_4, RealTek 8129/8139 driver rl(4) doesn't claim VLAN support
(when I assign vlandev rl0, my vlan device initially gets mtu 1496). In
modern (e.g. RELENG_6) systems if_rl claims native VLAN support. I've
tried setting 'ifconfig v
Hello!
In RELENG_4, RealTek 8129/8139 driver rl(4) doesn't claim VLAN support
(when I assign vlandev rl0, my vlan device initially gets mtu 1496). In
modern (e.g. RELENG_6) systems if_rl claims native VLAN support. I've
tried setting 'ifconfig vlan0 mtu 1500' for rl-based vlan device, and
resu
Hello!
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 03:26:25PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote:
Oh, by the way: I should mention that the server is running FreeBSD
4.11. It's doing file-intensive work, and file system performance
in FreeBSD 6.x is noticeably slower.
ipfw tables a
Hello!
What is the current status of the fast IP forwarding in RELENG_4 and in
modern versions (CURRENT/RELENG_6)? I see that this code (either ip_flow.*
in RELENG_4 or ip_fastfwd.c in RELENG_6) is always included into kernel
(no separate option for it), but is disabled by default. What are dra
Hello!
On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Why not? IMHO it will be very useful feature: think about e.g. traffic
shaping for several different networks which are routed via the same
ipsec tunnel. Without the enc0, you can only shape them together, e.g.:
why not shaping on the internal
Hello!
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 12:28:13AM +0200, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
2) use enc0 support, which is actually pr kern/94829, and which should
be included soon in kernel.
Oh god! Not another ifnet! NoOO!!
Why not? IMHO it will be ver
Hello!
Suppose you have to build a high-performance router with several NICs,
and you have to use a mix of D-Link DFE-570TX (21143, MII, quad port) served
by dc(4), and several Intel 82558/9/0 adapters served by fxp(4). Router
has to have 2-3 high-speed connections and several ones which lower
Hello!
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Barney Wolff wrote:
> Is the problem that the two systems have different ideas of MSL?
I haven't changed default
net.inet.tcp.msl: 3
on server. Note that on client side, connection never goes to TIME WAIT,
because during active FTP server side closes data connec
Hello!
> Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 19:07:35 -0500 (CDT)
> From: Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>
>> A port should not be reused this fast. Maybe the randomness isn't
>> so random after all and choses the same port over again and again?
>
Hello!
I've tried to install 4.10-RELEASE via FTP several times, but every time
(earlier or later) FTP transfers were aborted with code "425 Failed to
establish connection.", and FTP site selection menu popped up again. My FTP
server is vsftpd-1.2.2 server built from fresh ports on 4.7-RELEASE s
19 matches
Mail list logo
