Re: IPv6 over gif(4) broken in 6.2-RELEASE?

2007-02-11 Thread Dimitry Andric
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote: >> Confirmed. I've updated the machine on which I originally had this >> problem to -STABLE as of today, and the problem has disappeared. > > I thought it was also planned to be incorporated to RELENG_6_2, right? I'm not sure if non-security related fixes are consider

Re: IPv6 over gif(4) broken in 6.2-RELEASE?

2007-02-09 Thread Dimitry Andric
Bruce A. Mah wrote: > I've convinced myself that this problem needs to be tested in isolation > (i.e. you have complete control over both ends of the tunnel) because > incoming packets over the tunnel cause the host route to get added > automatically if it wasn't there already. > > After reading t

Re: IPv6 over gif(4) broken in 6.2-RELEASE?

2007-01-23 Thread Dimitry Andric
Bruce A. Mah wrote: Just to confirm, you're dealing with a gif(4) interface with an explicitly-configured destination address and a 128-bit prefixlen, yes? Yes. The specific line in my rc.conf is: ipv6_ifconfig_gif0="2001:7b8:2ff:146::2 2001:7b8:2ff:146::1 prefixlen 128" Maybe there is som

Re: IPv6 over gif(4) broken in 6.2-RELEASE?

2007-01-22 Thread Dimitry Andric
Bruce A. Mah wrote: >> and later I found out it was caused by commit 1.48.2.16: >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-December/031853.html > > This isn't consistent with what I'm finding. For one thing, rev. > 1.48.2.16 of nd6.c isn't in 6.2-RELEASE but I saw the problem there

Re: IPv6 over gif(4) broken in 6.2-RELEASE?

2007-01-21 Thread Dimitry Andric
Bruce A. Mah wrote: >> I remember Dimitry Andric reported the same problem on -stable on 30 >> Dec, and after he reverted rev.1.48.2.16 it worked fine again. Do >> you have the symptom even on 6.2-RELEASE? Since RELENG_6_2_0_RELEASE >> did not have the change, I thou