The following reply was made to PR kern/110284; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Devon H. O'Dell"
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, ga...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/110284: [if_ethersubr] Invalid Assumption in SIOCSIFADDR in
ether_ioctl()
Date: W
The following reply was made to PR kern/110284; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Devon H. O'Dell"
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, ga...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/110284: [if_ethersubr] Invalid Assumption in SIOCSIFADDR in
ether_ioctl()
Date: W
2012/5/16 Devon H. O'Dell :
> Hi Gavin, freebsd-net,
>
> --- if_ethersubr.c 2011-09-22 20:51:37.0 -0400
> +++ /home/dho/if_ethersubr.c 2012-05-16 22:27:17.0 -0400
> @@ -1146,7 +1146,9 @@
> switch (ifa->ifa_addr-&g
Hi Gavin, freebsd-net,
I submitted this PR when I worked at Coyote Point. I'm no longer
there, but I do remember this issue well. The discussion around this
patch happened on IRC and not the PR, which is unfortunate. If I
recall correctly, rwatson's stance was that the real fix was to fix
the hein