Re: ixl 40G bad performance?

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 10 December 2015 at 10:29, Denis Pearson > wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Eggert, Lars wrote: > > > >> On 2015-10-26, at 18:40, Eggert, Lars wrote: > >> > On 2015-10-26, at 17:

Re: ixl 40G bad performance?

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Eggert, Lars wrote: > On 2015-10-26, at 18:40, Eggert, Lars wrote: > > On 2015-10-26, at 17:08, Pieper, Jeffrey E > wrote: > >> As a caveat, this was using default netperf message sizes. > > > > I get the same ~3 Gb/s with the default netperf sizes and driver 1.