On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 09:38:03PM +0300, Maxim Konovalov scribed:
> >
> > Just a ping on this one - I've received several emails from
> > people off the list asking if I'd found a fix for the problem.
> > It seems like it would be grand if you could commit your fix
> > to 5-STABLE instead of waiti
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 06:33:11PM +0100, Andre Oppermann scribed:
> "David G. Andersen" wrote:
> >
> > The last messages I saw in the archives about kern/73129 indicated
> > that it was going to be fixed "shortly"
> >
> > (73129 is the &q
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 01:58:28PM -0500, David G. Andersen scribed:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 06:33:11PM +0100, Andre Oppermann scribed:
> > >
> > > (Barring that, has anyone patched it in their own system, and if so,
> > > would you mind sending me the patch? I
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 06:33:11PM +0100, Andre Oppermann scribed:
> >
> > (Barring that, has anyone patched it in their own system, and if so,
> > would you mind sending me the patch? I dislike running custom kernel
> > code on these machines, but I'm happy to do so to get things working. :)
>
The last messages I saw in the archives about kern/73129 indicated
that it was going to be fixed "shortly"
(73129 is the "IPFW misbehavior in RELENG_5 thread" -- it's no longer
possible to use ipfw fwd to perform policy routing).
This bug is on my critical path for getting my network entirely swa
