lla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.4; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9)
Gecko/20100825 Thunderbird/3.1.3
On 9/13/10 5:18 PM, Dave Seddon wrote:
> Greetings Julian,
>
> I've been wondering if it's possible to increase the number of FreeBSD
> route tables to a larger number. It seems this
Greetings,
I'm running ipf+ipnat and proftp. I'm encountering a problem where the data
connection is working fine, however because there's a large tranfer no data
is tranferred on port 21, so the port 21 session dies (ttl expires).
The transfer is running now.
How can I change the ttl on t
100
#define MAX_POLL_BURST_MAX 1
I tried doing this, but encountered the problems with the throughput somehow
related to the em cards and gave up. Maybe you're results will be better.
Regards,
Dave Seddon
Ferdinand Goldmann writes:
Kevin Day wrote:
In one case, we had a sys
Under 5.4 this revision of the em card doesn't work: 82546EB
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:1:0: class=0x02 card=0x00db0e11 chip=0x10108086 rev=0x01
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
device = '82546EB Dual Port Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper)'
class= networ
Jeremie,
Sorry for "top posting". My time machine is broken :)
Kevin,
You mention your running at "near" line rate. What are you pushing or
pulling? Whats the rough spec of these machines pushing out this much data?
What setting do you have for the polling? I've been trying to do near lin
niffing 150MB/s. Normally libpcap can't
handle that amount of traffic.
Regards,
Dave Seddon
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Greetings,
Yes I was wondering about doing that the other day. I'd like to here how
you go if you do get somewhere. Perhaps this is how the load generators
work? I've been using one based on SmartBits, which seems to be linux.
Dave
Nickolay Kritsky writes:
combination of tcpdump and
There seem to be serious issues around this driver. There have been many
posts on this list in the last days particularly, as well as over the last
few months. People seem to be looking at it, and I guess once we all rush
out and by other (e.g. broadcom) NICs intel might try to help.
dave
Can we try running the windows drivers? Wasn't that called project evil.
Dave
Scott M. Ferris writes:
On 9/26/05, Petri Helenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anyone have the programming data for the chipsets so the driver
could be taken further? I've been unable to obtain them from I
So ditch pf and let us know. Or swap to ipf
Z.C.B. writes:
I am positive it is something to do with pf. I copied the exact same
config file from the vpn server over to another box and pointed the
client at it and it worked perfectly fine. Any one see any thing odd
in that pf setup or have any
Greetings,
We would all be very interested to see the complete report. Particularly if
you fix up the results for FreeBSD :)
Chucks right, we need waaay more info. We don't even know what version of
FreeBSD your running.
There are lots of sysctl variables to adjust. Here's a bunch I play
Greetings,
There seems to be heaps of people on the list reporting errors with em cards
and FreeBSD 5.4 -stable-ish (as in cvsup-ed within the last couple of
months). Are there many people running these ok? Perhaps is not the
network card so much as some other element of the computer?
Rega
ISP does drop ICMP then the
don't defragment option will just result in packets disappearing anyway.
Regards,
Dave Seddon
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
skipto
man ipfw -> e.g. ipfw add 10 skipto 4000 all from any to any layer2 out
Brett Glass writes:
For years, we've used "Dummynet" in FreeBSD for bandwidth control.
Unfortunately, the semantics of IPFW can, at times, make the use of
Dummynet awkward and inefficient. For example, suppose
It would also be interesting to know if you've got device polling enabled.
If so, what sysctl settings do you have.
Regards,
Dave Seddon
Mike Tancsa writes:
On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 14:15:51 -0400, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you
wrote:
Im having an issue with my new linksys eg103
Just configure /etc/rc.conf with one of these options and the firewall
should work.
These are the options, from /etc/rc.firewall:
# Define the firewall type in /etc/rc.conf. Valid values are:
# open - will allow anyone in
# client - will try to protect just this machine
Or just
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
spanning-tree portfast
Or disable spanning tree
no spanning-tree vlan 1-100
You could also do some MAC address filtering as the BPDUs are ethernet
multicast, but that smacks of hard work. :)
Peter Wood writes:
Sods law, after working on this f
Greetings,
You need a seperate routing table. Try using Xen
(http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/), or there's a patch
floating around for FreeBSD4.9.
Dave
Barney Wolff writes:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 09:58:14AM -0500, Will Maier wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 10:36:04AM -
What ISP is it? You sure the ISP doesn't use PPPeE?
Dave
Digital Brain writes:
Hi Chuck and thanks for your reply -- unfortunately dhclient still fails
to get an IP...
Here's a copy of my dhclient.conf:
#dhclient config for interface ed0
interface "ed0" {
send host-name "
ance
the load across multiple gig links with traffic going to a sinlge backup
host, for example. (I you want to know how I'll have to look that up)
Regards,
Dave Seddon
Evgueni V. Gavrilov writes:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
IP addresses. It would be cool
Greetings,
- Gig cards are cheap.
- PCI bus throughput is really bad (like 32MB/s)
- There is no easy way to "bond" on FreeBSD, but you can just use multiple
IP addresses. It would be cool to have something like Etherchannel, but
that doesn't work. Solaris has Etherchannel.
Regards,
Dave
Greetings,
Also, how were you measuring the packet and data rate? What were you using
to generate the traffic?
I used /usr/ports/benchmark/siege and /usr/ports/www/thttpd.
Regards,
Dave
Mao Shou Yan writes:
Hi, all,
I have a machine with 3 Intel pro1000 cards.
em0 is in promisc
Greetings,
Yeah I'd say there is something funny also. I've stuffed around with HZ and
polling settings heaps and could only manage about 120MB/s-ish of HTTP
traffic. I'm as running 5.4-stable from about 2-3 weeks ago.
/etc/sysctl.conf
kern.polling.enable=1
kern.polling.each_burst=50
#need
uot;
So you want:
ifconfig_dc0="100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex"
ifconfig_dc1="100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex"
Regards,
Dave Seddon
dave writes:
Hello,
I'm trying to get a pair of netgear cards to work on a 5.4-RELEASE-p6
box. My rc.conf looks as follows:
if
isn’t usually very high, and it is more likely to be secure if
the daemons are separate. If somebody was going to run a large instance of
routing they should probably use a router, not a unix box.
Regards,
Dave Seddon
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
Perhaps a quick "fix" to the bug would be to output a message to the console
when somebody tried to set the tcp.sendspace or tcp.recvspace space > 65535
* 2.
Regards,
Dave Seddon
Pieter de Boer writes:
Mike Silbersack wrote:
net.inet.tcp.sendspace=1024000
net.inet.
ghts on multiple IP stacks on
FreeBSD. It would be really cool to be able to give a jail it's own IP
stack bound to a VLAN interface. It could then be like a VRF on Cisco.
Regards,
Dave Seddon
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://list
So as for the system losing all network connectivity, do you have any
suggestions?
regards,
Dave
Kris Kennaway writes:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 01:49:32PM +1000, Dave+Seddon wrote:
Greetings,
I'm trying to do some performance testing of a content filtering system, so
I'm try
0
options=4b
ether 00:11:0a:56:b2:4c
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX )
status: active
em3: flags=8843 mtu 1500
options=4b
ether 00:11:0a:56:b2:4d
media: Ethernet autoselect
status: no carrier
lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384
inet
29 matches
Mail list logo
