p://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/2012-March/035888.html
>>
>> ---Mike
>>
>> On 4/3/2012 10:19 AM, Darren Baginski wrote:
>>> Still getting same errors on
>>> FreeBSD srv-4-2.lab.local 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #3: Mon Apr 2
>
has a number of fixes in it to both the
> igb and em drivers that is not yet in RELENG_9 nor 8
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/2012-March/035888.html
>
> ---Mike
>
> On 4/3/2012 10:19 AM, Darren Baginski wrote:
>
>> Still getting same error
C'd to 9.x. Only to 8.x ---Mike On 2/22/2012 1:23 PM, Darren Baginski wrote: > Same problem on > FreeBSD srv-4-2.lab.local 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #2: Wed Feb 22
18:10:53 UTC 2012 mailto:r...@srv-4-2.lab.local";>r...@srv-4-2.lab.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENER
Same problem on
FreeBSD srv-4-2.lab.local 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #2: Wed Feb 22 18:10:53
UTC 2012 r...@srv-4-2.lab.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
16.02.2012, 02:27, "Jack Vogel" :
> And assuming its from the release, please upgrade it to HEAD and try again.
>
> Jack
>
> On W
:
Hi!
After about 2 weeks of uptime I'm getting messages like that:
igb0: Watchdog timeout -- resetting
igb0: Queue(0) tdh = 16, hw tdt = 20
igb0: TX(0) desc avail = 1020,Next TX to Clean = 16
igb0: link state changed to DOWN
igb0: link state changed to UP
Reboot helps, for the next ~2 weeks.
Hi!
After about 2 weeks of uptime I'm getting messages like that:
igb0: Watchdog timeout -- resetting
igb0: Queue(0) tdh = 16, hw tdt = 20
igb0: TX(0) desc avail = 1020,Next TX to Clean = 16
igb0: link state changed to DOWN
igb0: link state changed to UP
Reboot helps, for the next ~2 weeks.
Kern
So your idea to disable MSI and test?
If it's the same issue, it should disappear but would cost performance loss?
Am I right ?
30.11.2011, 13:13, "Emil Muratov" :
> On 28.11.2011 21:28, Darren Baginski wrote:
>
>> All RX, not a single packet arrives.
>
> I hav
All RX, not a single packet arrives.
28.11.2011, 04:59, "Adrian Chadd" :
> Hi,
>
> Are all RX frames dropped at that point, or just the BGP TCP session
> related IP frames?
>
> Adrian
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mai
the bce works.
What else can be done to debug this ?
27.11.2011, 21:59, "Kevin Oberman" :
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Darren Baginski wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I'm having issues with OpenBGPd openbgpd-4.9.20110612_1 running on
>> FreebBSD 9-PR
Hi!
I'm having issues with OpenBGPd openbgpd-4.9.20110612_1 running on FreebBSD
9-PRERELEASE.
BGP sessions flap for no reason every ~4hours, bgp sessions itself receive only
default form cisco router.
FreeBSD 8.2 is not affected.
How can I troubleshot this?
___
Hi!
Could please some tell me if bug
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2011-February/027895.html
was fixed in any release?
If not is there any workaround?
I'm still facing with it 8.2-RELEASE.
Sorry if that question was answered already. Can't find an answer.
Thank you! You are right, exactly the same issue as in PR you mentioned.
09.05.2011, 19:53, "Mike Oliver" :
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 11:02, Darren Baginski ; wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I've noticed rather strange pf behavior on FreeBSD box (8.2 and 7.4 in
Hi!
I've noticed rather strange pf behavior on FreeBSD box (8.2 and 7.4 in
particular)
Consider this rule
pass out proto tcp from self to any flags S/SA keep state
despite the fact pf starts after netif
if doesn't not create rule
pass out inet6 proto tcp from 2001:xxx:xxx:xxx::::ff26
13 matches
Mail list logo
