I can see.
--
Darcy Buskermolen
Wavefire Technologies Corp.
http://www.wavefire.com
ph: 250.717.0200
fx: 250.763.1759
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Tuesday 09 August 2005 13:48, Darcy Buskermolen wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 August 2005 11:16, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:54:21AM -0700, Darcy Buskermolen wrote:
> > > I'm getting the following panic on my RELENG_6 test box:
> > >
> >
On Tuesday 09 August 2005 11:16, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:54:21AM -0700, Darcy Buskermolen wrote:
> > I'm getting the following panic on my RELENG_6 test box:
> >
> > xl1f0: BUG: if_attach called without if_alloc'd input()
> >
> &
I'm getting the following panic on my RELENG_6 test box:
xl1f0: BUG: if_attach called without if_alloc'd input()
Where should I be looking to track this down? I suspect it has to do with a
custom kernel, it wasn't doing it when i was running GENERIC
--
Darcy Buskermolen
Wavefi
In an effort to test the bridge device, I followed the instructions in
man if_bridge to create the bridge, I received an SIOCIFCREATE Invalid
argument, so I figured I needed to load the bridging code module. When I
attempt to kldload if_bridge I get the above error.
If any further informatio
On Wednesday 16 March 2005 07:46, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Since talking about ng_fec, and the cisco switch, I started to play with
> it a bit, and one of the things I've finally setup is snmp/mrtg, so that I
> can monitor bw activity ...
>
> one thing that I've noticed is that two of my machines
On Friday 04 March 2005 14:34, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Sorry to bring what seems like a simple issue up here. I had been blaming
> slow afp filesharing between my OS-X (10.3.8 and previous) and FreeBSD 4.x
> boxes on netatalk's afp implementation for some time. Not too long ago I
>
It's been a while since the subject of ng_nat appeared on-list, I'm wondering
if there has been anymore work done on this?
--
Darcy Buskermolen
Wavefire Technologies Corp.
ph: 250.717.0200
fx: 250.763.1759
http://www.wavefire.com
___
f
al TCP load balancer
> that uses kqueue(2) would also solve your problem (I'm not aware of any
> off the top of my head... pound(8) does, but it is only used for HTTP
> and is not a reverse proxy) and would likely prevent you from having
> your problems. -sc
squid-de
ifconfig option.
>
> Of course, this still leaves a problem with specifying the address for
> an interface that has not yet been 'found' - after all, we can't
> ifmaybeload() a driver on just the link-level address of the card. This
> is a case w
CURRENT, but policy won't allow them to put them into production...
--
Darcy Buskermolen
Wavefire Technologies Corp.
ph: 250.717.0200
fx: 250.763.1759
http://www.wavefire.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
I know this option isn't valid in FreeBSD's natd and I'm not sure if perhaps
it is handleded transparently. But with out this option under OSX I saw
simular problems as to what you are describing when natting packets, even
though the same download form the gateway were AOK
Why not just add soem simple firewall rules such as:
ipfw add deny ip from private_private to public_private
ipfw add deny ip from public_private to private_private
before you do your divert rule ?
--
Darcy Buskermolen
Wavefire Technologies Corp.
ph: 250.717.0200
fx: 250.763.1759
http://www.wavefire.com
_
ligent man requires only two thousand five hundred."
> > - The Mahabharata
> >
> > ___
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> > To unsubsc
) you can have your proxy working.
>
> skipto 510 tcp from 192.168.0.1 to any dst-port 80
>
>
>
> From: Darcy Buskermolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Transparent Proxy
> >Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 16:42:09 -0800
>
;
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
--
Darcy Buskermolen
Wavefire
ind online regaring setting up transparent proxying
for squid using ipfw shows squid running on the gateway host, or on a
diffrent network segment. Can anybody point me in the correct direction to
tell me what it is that I'm missing?
--
Darcy Buskermolen
Wavefire Technologies Corp.
ph:
erver: NS.ASAHIKAWA.WIDE.AD.JP
Name Server: NS2.ASAHIKAWA.WIDE.AD.JP
Updated Date: 01-aug-2002
>>> Last update of whois database: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:15:09 EST <<<
The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .ORG, .EDU domains and
Registrars.
No match for "netnice.org&q
???
> THANX
>
>
> _
> Broadband? Dial-up? Get reliable MSN Internet Access.
> http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
-
.162.138.19325 6 524916
>
> which does make sense (ie. source port -> dest port) ...
>
> is there something that i can do with libpcap that will give me better
> information then trafd does? is there a 'tag' in the IP headers that can
> be used to dete
Has there been any work done on adding POLLING support to the xl driver?
--
Darcy Buskermolen
Wavefire Technologies Corp.
ph: 250.717.0200
fx: 250.763.1759
http://www.wavefire.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
You can configure your cache server to send an X-header with the
originateing IP, and then use that..
At 06:18 PM 12/11/01 -0800, Kelly Yancey wrote:
>On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Tom Peck wrote:
>
>> Hi Julian
>>
>> Yes, we currently have Squid serving this purpose - but as I stated in my
>> first em
Is there a reason that you are spanning 2 subnets but only have 1 of then setup as the full class C ?
"inet 209.51.xxx.xxx netmask 255.255.255.0"
alias0="inet 209.190.xxx.xxx netmask 255.255.255.255"
You may need to chang alias0 to alias0="inet 209.190.xxx.xxx netmask 255.255.255.0"
At
23 matches
Mail list logo
