7.0.
The (in)frequency of the problem makes me wonder if it's actually a
resource exhaustion problem.
Has anyone got any suggestions?
--
WBR,
Cordiali Saluti,
Daniel Ponticello, VP of Engineering
Network Coordination Centre of Skytek
---
- For further information about our servi
have more informations to open a PR.
Thanks,
Daniel
Jeremy Chadwick ha scritto:
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 03:07:08PM +0200, Daniel Ponticello wrote:
Sorry, I did not read well you suggestion ;)
Anyway, the system reboots correctly if I issue the reboot command from
command line.
Should i
Sorry, I did not read well you suggestion ;)
Anyway, the system reboots correctly if I issue the reboot command from
command line.
Should i adjust those values anyway?
Thanks,
Daniel
Daniel Ponticello ha scritto:
Hello,
disabling acpi is not an option, since i'm running SMP.
I
Hello,
disabling acpi is not an option, since i'm running SMP.
I have several other systems running 7.0 Release without problems,
so it might be something on 7-Stable.
Thanks,
Daniel
Jeremy Chadwick ha scritto:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 11:34:41PM +0200, Daniel Ponticello wrote:
ideas of why i wasn't able to collect dump and the
system did not
reboot automatically?
Thanks,
Daniel
--
WBR,
Cordiali Saluti,
Daniel Ponticello, VP of Engineering
Network Coordination Centre of Skytek
---
- For further information about our services:
- Please visit our website at
ault
cpuid = 0
It just stays there, unresponsive (no automatic reboot).
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Daniel
--
WBR,
Cordiali Saluti,
Daniel Ponticello, VP of Engineering
Network Coordination Centre of Skytek
---
- For further information about our services:
- Please visit our websi
t;
Since there's no possibility to copy via putty i'm copying by hand...
hopefully there are not too many errors :-)
--
WBR,
Cordiali Saluti,
Daniel Ponticello, VP of Engineering
Network Coordination Centre of Skytek
---
- For further information about our services:
- P
t
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Well, the latency then could be related to spanning tree protocol not
immediatly
forwarding traffic to the new port due to topology change. Try to
disable it on the switch.
Daniel
--
WBR,
Cordiali Saluti,
Daniel Ponticello, VP
: no carrier even on lagg0 interface, while bce0 shows no
carrier (correct) and
bce1 is active.
Any ideas?
Thanks!
Daniel
--
WBR,
Cordiali Saluti,
Daniel Ponticello, VP of Engineering
Network Coordination Centre of Skytek
---
- For further information about our services:
- Please visit
