Ermal Luçi wrote:
> Ok thanks to remko@ for hosting it!
>
> You can find it here:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~remko/patches/dummynet_pf.tar.gz
>
> Please test and give feedback.
I am really interested in your patch and hope that I will soon have time to
test it.
Meanwhile, I would like to ask
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> I'm looking to do some consulting on a project that will involve wireless
> networks ... since, if it goes forward, I'm going to be the "Unix person",
> so,
> of course, the unix side will be FreeBSD ...
>
> ... but, I haven't used wireless at all under FreeBSD ...
Thank you all for your replies.
Kirill Ponazdyr wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> A few days ago I tested whether a FreeBSD 7 box is able to handle Gigabit
>> Can anybody point me what the bottleneck of this configuration is? CPU was
>> mostly idle and PCIe 1x should carry way more. Or is the experiment
>>
Hi list,
A few days ago I tested whether a FreeBSD 7 box is able to handle Gigabit
traffic. So I used a Cisco 7600 and added static routes from the router to the
box and from the box to the router, so that some packets would loop between the
two. Then I externally injected 30Mbps of "ping -f -t 25
>> There is another thing I wanted to point out. I remember you used the
>> words "authentication web page". This made me think you are
>> establishing a captive portal, which is not secure at all. If I
>> understand well the authpf solution would be secure, except perhaps
>> a small delay. You
Christopher Cowart wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 11:58:15AM +0300, Cristian KLEIN wrote:
>> Christopher Cowart wrote:
>>> We're working on expanding our wireless network. Unfortunately, we're
>>> running out of IP addresses (aren't we all). As much as
Hi,
Christopher Cowart wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We're working on expanding our wireless network. Unfortunately, we're
> running out of IP addresses (aren't we all). As much as I'd love to just
> tell everyone to use IPv6, that isn't gonna fly. The next plan to
> consider is using an RFC1918 pool and
T_IPSEC, and show the use of gif, however I think
> this needs to be updated/rewritten. (If I get the time I really feel for
> writing an alternative page about IPSEC with FreeBSD and maybe the
> result get accepted for inclusion in the handbook.)
>
--
+--
Steve Bertrand wrote:
>> But OpenBGPD doesn't look like an alternative for you, if you are using
>> ipv6 as it only supports ipv4 route distribution (according to man pages)
>
> IPv6 is an absolute MANDATORY requirement. If a recommendation does not
> support IPv6, than it will NOT fit into my env
Mohacsi Janos wrote:
> Hi Henri,
> I am not on the list of freebsd-net therefore I send you off list
> the answers. FreeBSD-pf team rather reluctant to change the order. I
> sent a PR about this a while ago:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/113650
>
> Solution is use "(if_name)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> For a special test reason, I must use two hosts and it has two interfaces
> to connect each other without any switch or hub.
> Host1 Host2
> |-| |-|
> | 1 0-0 1 |
> | | | |
>
The following reply was made to PR kern/112612; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Cristian KLEIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/112612: [lo] Traffic via additional lo(4) interface shows
up on lo0 in bpf(4)
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 17
Hi everybody,
I have a very restrictive NAT gateway. In order to provide outside FTP
access, I use FreeBSD 5.4 + PF + ftp-proxy. All clients are
transparently redirected to ftp-proxy, and both active and passive mode
used to work just fine. Packets are allowed if they are to/from user
proxy, so, e
On Vin, Iunie 15, 2007 7:27 pm, David DeSimone wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>>> But the (somewhat weird) requirements are that the vlan interface on
>>> machine1 shouldn't have assigned IP address, but the second one sh
The following reply was made to PR kern/113548; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Cristian KLEIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Alexey Illarionov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: kern/113548: [dummynet] [patch] system hangs with dummynet queues
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10
The following reply was made to PR kern/113548; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Cristian KLEIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/113548: [dummynet] [patch] system hangs with dummynet queues
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:35:21 +0300
I thi
Hi,
Thank you for your quick reply.
Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
> Cristian KLEIN wrote:
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> I am new to FreeBSD kernel hacking, so please excuse my perhaps stupid
>> questions.
>>
>> I would like to add key support to gre(4). I have al
Hello everybody,
I am new to FreeBSD kernel hacking, so please excuse my perhaps stupid
questions.
I would like to add key support to gre(4). I have already been able to
use gre(4) with a hardcoded key. The single thing remaining to do is to
transfer the key from ifconfig(8). The key is an uint32
18 matches
Mail list logo
