On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 08:15:57PM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya wrote:
> > Attached is a quick hack to protect the cached route with a mutex. A
> > better fix with less overhead would be to allocate the route in a local
> > variable on the stack, and only copy it to the softc if route caching is
> > enabl
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 08:05:28PM -0600, Craig Boston wrote:
> Attached is a quick hack...
Whoops, patch _actually_ attached this time.
=== net/if_gif.c
==
--- net/if_gif.c(/vendor/sys) (revision 292)
+++ net/if_gi
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 09:20:33AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I seem to be running into a race condition in ip6_getpmtu. I've been
> having sporadic panics recently -- sometimes the machine will last a
> week, sometimes it'll panic twice in a day. The backtrace is always the
> same:
>
> --
Dan Allen wrote:
> The following change appears to have crashed my network today.
Ditto, this killed both my wireless and wired interfaces upon a cvsup to
the latest RELENG_6. It just sent a continuous stream of ARP queries,
many per second, despite getting replies and populating the routing
tabl
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 12:59:39PM +0900, SUZUKI Shinsuke wrote:
> Hello Craig,
> I think I've done with it.
>
> Could you please try the following patch?
> http://www.kame.net/~suz/in6.c.diff.releng60
Been running with your patch all day and so far no problems whatsoever.
I can run ifconfi
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 12:04:53AM +0900, SUZUKI Shinsuke wrote:
> I tried the same test using my PC with fxp drivers, but your phenomena
> did not happen in my environment (at least for five hours).
>
> Maybe the configured prefix was regarded as off-link by some reason.
> (it is theoretically po
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 12:55:49PM +0900, SUZUKI Shinsuke wrote:
> Let me confirm.
>
> In your configuration, em0 and em1 have the same prefix.
> Is it intentionally configured?
> #normally, IPv6 operator does not assign prefix in such manner...
Yes, but em0 and em1 are on different computers att
[ I'm not subscribed to net@ so please copy me! ]
It's been a while since I've used IPv6 (was on 4.x), so it's possible
I'm doing something wrong, but it seems like this should work.
Setup: A simple network with 3 or 4 FreeBSD boxes running 6.0-RC1. No
contact with the outside world, no routers,
