On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> I have had another report of this problem, I am nominally on vacation for a
> couple of weeks, but have promised to look at the issue after the holidays.
I am available to test any patches. Thank you for your help.
-Corey
y other driver seems to properly process vlan tags without having
to create vlan sub interfaces. Any ideas on how to make vlan tag
processing the default behavior on this hardware?
-Corey Smith
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
vironment it would be sufficient to run STP on the untagged physical
interface so the vlan interfaces would only send and receive on the
forwarding member.
-Corey Smith
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freeb
s actually
supported by Cisco switches and has a cleaner config
Is there a way to accomplish this task using FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE ?
-Corey Smith
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe
s is at:
http://www.dsm.fordham.edu/~tanzer/multipath/
Unfortunately it hasn't been updated past FreeBSD 4.8.
Maybe a FreeBSD winter-of-code project? :) Any takers?
-Corey Smith
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/l
er flow load balancing in FreeBSD? Are
multiple default routes supported?
It would be beautiful if you could put multiple routes with the same
metric into the kernel and then the kernel would enable per flow load
balancing of the routes...
-Corey Smith
_
