Re: PLEASE HEEEEEELLLLPPPP ME...

2003-07-25 Thread Clement Laforet
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 20:10:18 -0400 "Matthew Emmerton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Or, switch to using IPFILTER/IPNAT which has special features to > handle the case of FTP. > > MAtt libalias (so natd) handles FTP, based on destination port (ie port == 21). It rewrites 227/229 replies and, inter

Re: Problem of newbee !!!

2003-07-18 Thread Clement Laforet
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 21:58:33 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I read man and some informations on forums about natd and so, I tried: > natd -redirect_port tcp 10.1.0.1:20-21 20-21 you need to load natd like this : natd -dynamic -n tun0 -redirect_port tcp 10.1.0.1:20-21 20-21 regards, clem

Re: Performance improvement for NAT in IPFIREWALL

2003-07-02 Thread Clement Laforet
Hi, On Wed, 2 Jul 2003 18:39:42 -0500 (CDT) Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Comments? Suggestions? Vision? > > If you have some time to throw at the problem, you might consider > using gprof on natd in order to determine what exactly about natd is > slow. As is commonly mentioned

Re: Bandwidth monitoring

2003-06-24 Thread Clement Laforet
What about IPA ? http://ipa-system.sourceforge.net/ ${PORTSDIR}/sysutils/ipa regards, clem On 24 Jun 2003 11:13:01 -0400 Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My ISP is placing strict restrictions on how much I can transfer each > month, with high penalties for exceeding their limits. However, the