On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:01:35AM +0100, Borja Marcos wrote:
>
> On Jan 10, 2012, at 12:01 AM, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>
> > Since it is possible to add MD5 for neighbors on config reload and the
> > listening sockets are normaly not closed and reopened on config reload it
&
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 11:01:44AM +0100, Borja Marcos wrote:
>
> On Jan 4, 2012, at 10:28 AM, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 09:27:28AM +0100, Borja Marcos wrote:
> >>
> >> Behavior on FreeBSD: The setsockopt(TCP_MD5SIG) *enables* TCP
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 10:35:01AM -0500, Ed Maste wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 08:18:39PM -0500, J David wrote:
>
> > To help understand what's going on and test some of this stuff, I
> > hacked up a TCP-MD5-aware echo server and tried various things.
>
> Hi J David,
>
> Thank you very much
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 09:27:28AM +0100, Borja Marcos wrote:
>
> On Jan 3, 2012, at 4:29 PM, Ed Maste wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the link Nikolay.
> >
> > Borja, I assume it's the PR submission form that gave you trouble -
> > sorry for that. Based on your report it sounds to me like the bug is
>
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 02:16:35PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 11/23/10 14:03, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> >On 11/23/2010 7:47 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> >>It looks like I'm unfortunate enough to have to deploy on a machine
> >>which has the 82574L Intel NIC chip on a Supermicro X8SIE-F board, which
> >>ap
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:16:34PM -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:04:02PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > On 23.08.2010 19:52, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > >On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:18:01PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > >>On 23.08.2010 11:26, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 12:38:07AM -0800, Xin LI wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A friend of mine has encountered some problem in his setup which
> consists a pair of GRE peer, one running on OpenBSD and another
> running FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE; with 7.2-STABLE, there is no improvement
> over the situation. The pr
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 02:43:46PM +, Tom Judge wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> We have had some issues with running both carp and VRRP in the same
> physical segment. It has mostly caused issues with the embedded devices
> running VRRP. One other side a
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 07:31:12AM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
> >> say i run routed and receive rip default from two routers, on the same
> >> local ether. what is the forwarding? i presume it's not smart enough
> >> to balance flows. i hope not alternating packets. clue, please?
> > Unless you h
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 07:48:32PM +, Stef Walter wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> > there are two ways to go with this one being what you have done teh
> > other to add fib info to the messages, Apparently
> > OpenBSD has implemented the second by re-using a disused field.
> > (I'm ve only be
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 01:05:51PM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
> I'm looking for a recommendation for a big endian CPU system that
> works well with FreeBSD. It would be best if it didn't use a 4KB
> page size but that's a secondary issue. The system should support
> PCI Express with at least
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:49:44AM +0100, Josef Pojsl wrote:
> Hi Eygene,
>
> Thanks a lot for your remarks. I absolutely agree with you
> that all columns are correct except the Nexthop.
>
The nexthop selection for point to point links had a bug in versions
previous to 4.2. This should be fixed
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:07:59PM -0600, Kevin Day wrote:
>
> I'm playing with 6.3-RC1 on a test box to see what breaks for us, and so
> far only one thing seems wrong...
>
> If I do:
>
> # route add 1.2.3.4/32 2.3.4.5 -sendpipe 131072
> add net 1.2.3.4: gateway 2.3.4.5
>
> It seems to work okay,
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 04:52:05PM +0100, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
> Folks have been asking about XORP in this thread.
>
> XORP can take a full BGP feed just fine as long as you have enough
> memory.; for a full default-free-zone feed, you are looking at in the
> region of 1GB - 1.5GB, perhaps le
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 04:56:22PM -0700, Bakul Shah wrote:
> > This is not the case. Flood ping doesn't reach the limit in any
> > way. Have a look at the ping man page and flood ping description.
>
> Ah yes, I was forgetting about the strict synchrony.
>
> > Stock FreeBSD 6.2 or 7.0 can easil
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 06:13:19PM +0100, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
> Claudio Jeker wrote:
> >Just because you believe that route caches are great doesn't mean it is
> >true. Show some real code and include benchmarks with various workloads
> >(e.g. a core router tha
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 05:37:50PM +0300, Ivo Vachkov wrote:
> Actually there is:
>
> structroute_in6 ip6_forward_rt;
>
> that "caches" the last route used (thanks blue !!!) but i think this
> technique is pointless in a multiflow traffic.
>
> Is it reasonable to believe that route cache
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 04:32:10PM +, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> Does anyone have any good suggestions for a book which discusses OSPF v3
> architecture?
>
> I have read the original John Moy book 'OSPF: Anatomy of an Internet
> routing protocol' but would very much like to know of there is a
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 02:22:11PM +0300, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> [...]
> > Any tests and test reports are very welcome.
>
> I saw a question asked several times but no answer: what happens with
> the sockets when you explicitly call setsockopt() to set a socket
> buffer size? Is automatic buffe
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 05:59:03PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-Sep-20 23:59:13 +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> >I have rewritten kern_sendfile() to work in two loops, the inner which turns
> >as many pages into mbufs as it can up to the free send socket buffer space.
>
> The 64K bloc
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 12:04:25AM +1000, Christopher Martin wrote:
>
> > I doubt that. Doing a per packet round robin over different pathes will
> > kill your tcp performance because of out of order packets.
>
> Noted. That's a very good reason. Maybe if there was a may to round robin on
> a ses
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 10:19:06PM +1000, Christopher Martin wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Baldur Gislason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, 23 June 2006 10:02 PM
> > To: Christopher Martin
> > Cc: FreeBSD Net Mailing list
> > Subject: Re: Multiple routes to the sa
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 11:50:37PM +0200, Bart Van Kerckhove wrote:
> Michael DeMan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> Hi gents and ladies,
> >
> > See inline...
> ditto
> >
> > On Mar 30, 2006, at 11:11 PM, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> >
> >> Michael DeMan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> So, if you al
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 01:15:04PM +0200, Ivo Vachkov wrote:
> > Normally it's the other way around.
>
> So be it :)
>
> My definition of Policy-Based Routing (PBR): ability make routing
> decision based on information other than destination IP address in the
> packet. In my project this "other"
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 05:07:27PM +0400, Steve Langdon wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> Help me to solve a strange conduct.
> I want to have permanent bundle with IP->MAC for users in our network to
> have some security. So, once my user's MAC doesn't appear in my ARP
> table, I have to block by ``arp -S
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 11:30:02AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>
> Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
>
> >Hello,
> >
> >>A quick question about if_tap, the tapwrite function
> >>( which copies an ethernet frame into an mbuf using uiotombuf )
> >>is broken on alpha and sparc64.
> >>The 14 byte ethernet
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:36:48PM +0200, Lars Erik Gullerud wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 05:14:52PM +0200, Lars Erik Gullerud wrote:
> >>
> >>...and can't safely be deployed in a lot of datacenter scenar
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:22:48PM +0300, Petri Helenius wrote:
> Claudio Jeker wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 05:14:52PM +0200, Lars Erik Gullerud wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> >>
> >>
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 05:14:52PM +0200, Lars Erik Gullerud wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
>
> >Charles Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>It's dead, I think: Cisco's lawyers started making predatory noises
> >>about their "intellectual property". Some people from N
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 02:52:15AM +0800, sam wun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Had openbgpd ported to freebsd or is it in any progress?
> If I want to install it in FreeBSD, is there any guideline for me to follow?
>
You have to remove the full pfkey interface and replace it with dummy
functions as it is in
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 08:34:35AM +0300, Ari Suutari wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Great to see natd maintained. As original author, I kind of miss
> the long command line options (ie. something like
> --daemon in addition to -d).
>
I used getopt(3) to parse the commandline because I hate to reinvent the
w
31 matches
Mail list logo
