Re: IPSEC documentation

2005-12-29 Thread Clark Gaylord
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:50:47 +0300, "Alexey Popov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > If we would also have NAT-T support, FreeBSD would be the best choice > of VPN concentrator. Yeah, what is the story with that anyway? Is anyone working on it? Is there hope? --ckg -- Clark

Re: IPSEC documentation

2005-12-28 Thread Clark Gaylord
blem once allows me to a) do it better and b) solve more problems. Labyrinthine solutions are inherently insecure. --ckg -- Clark Gaylord Blacksburg, VA USA [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listin

Re: IPSEC documentation

2005-12-28 Thread Clark Gaylord
ink state (if you have GRE keepalives), etc, to function correctly, and I think it is easier to see what is going on than the "transparent" IPsec tunnel approach. Haven't done it with FreeBSD, though. --ckg -- Clark Gaylord Blacksburg, VA USA [EMAIL PROTECTED] __

Re: hello, everyone , i have another question

2005-11-16 Thread Clark Gaylord
Jon wrote: I offten discover what such "/* XXX */ " annotate in source code of freebsd. what mean is "XXX"? These are "equivocation marks". They are placeholders for "I'm not sure I want to do this and want an easy way to find it again so I can undo it." Usually the intention is to co

[Fwd: Re: Making ICMP the default traceroute protocol?]

2005-01-24 Thread Clark Gaylord
Marian Durkovic wrote: seems that in today's networking environment the original traceroute concept utilising high UDP ports no longer works - since those ports are now typically blocked by firewalls. However, when traceroute is performed using ICMP protocol, the results are much better. Th

Re: [TEST/REVIEW] Netflow implementation

2004-09-10 Thread Clark Gaylord
Gleb Smirnoff wrote: Dumping to SQL is a bad idea. I have tried it, too :) Certainly dumping to MySQL is typically wretched ... to a real database much less so. --ckg ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-n

Re: fooling nmap

2004-09-04 Thread Clark Gaylord
Barney Wolff wrote: On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 01:28:28PM -0400, vxp wrote: in other words, what would you guys say be a _proper_ bsd-style thing to do, if this were to be done? Nothing. If you want to pollute your kernel with nonsense of this sort, go right ahead, but leave mine alone. Adding frill

Re: how to saturate 100Mbit

2003-12-12 Thread Clark Gaylord
Eugene Grosbein wrote: Is it possible to saturate 100Mbit ethernet using FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE, Pentium-133 & Intel 430VX-based motherboard (PCI-33), Intel 82559 Pro/100 Ethernet (fxp) ? I tried to use sendfile(2) on /dev/zero but that does not work. Then I created 8Tb holey file and used sendfile()

Re: proposed bootpd change

2003-12-01 Thread Clark Gaylord
Luigi Rizzo wrote: I can think of two ways to enable the user to configure the client port, one is to add a command-line flag to bootpd, the other one is to infer the client port number from the server port number, which is what the attached patch does. Would people be comfortable with modifying bo

Re: Fail OVer routing

2003-11-21 Thread Clark Gaylord
yes, it is called a dynamic routing protocol. --ckg hilman firmansyah wrote: Is there any method for fail over routing ( not dymanic routing protocols ) . 1 Corporate office connetcted via wireless fast link and adsl low speed. IF the wireless down , the routing move to low speed adsl. And when

RE: subnetting C class into /26 /25 /26, why can this be done?

2003-08-27 Thread Clark Gaylord
When in doubt, do it in binary: 0 = 64 = 0100 128 = 1000 192 = 1100 As a /26 (taking as given the 24 x's not shown for the other three octets): xxyy - y's are the host xx doesn't have the same value from 64-191 As a /25: xyy - y's

Re: MPLS

2002-05-31 Thread Clark Gaylord
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 12:16:50PM -0700, Paul Traina wrote: > > > Bwah... It lacks things like transparent-nexthop and transparent-as > > which is quite useful in Route Servers and such. > > We don't add features to code unless people are willing to pay for them and > use them. which is why we

Re: Tuning UDP for NFS

2001-09-01 Thread Clark Gaylord
In various performance tests we have found proto=tcp to be uniformly a Good Thing. I'd vote for that to be default in general, but perhaps there is an AMD-specific reason for UDP; I can't imagine what that would be, though. --ckg On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 01:03:46PM -0700, John Polstra wrote: > I

Re: fastforwarding?

2001-06-29 Thread Clark Gaylord
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 11:18:31AM -0500, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Clark Gaylord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010629 06:59] wrote: > > I notice the man page points out that this prevents the use of > > ipfilter, etc. The first packet(s?) do get forwarded by the usual > > p

Re: fastforwarding?

2001-06-29 Thread Clark Gaylord
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 10:39:20PM -0600, Wes Peters wrote: > Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 06:47:41PM -0400, Deepak Jain wrote: > > > ... > > > What does the fastforwarding option do that the normal forwarding option > > > doesn't? > > > > > See inet(4). > > The description t

[singh@pdx.edu: UDP - Reliable throughput mesaurement tool]

2001-05-27 Thread Clark Gaylord
- Forwarded message from Harkirat Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - > I want to measure UDP thruput of lossy channel, is there any tool > which tests it? I looked at some of the tools but these do not take care > of loss, I mean no retransmisson, just measure raw thruput of UDP (TTCP > is one of

Re: ifindex

2001-05-18 Thread Clark Gaylord
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 06:06:55AM +0100, vishwanath pargaonkar wrote: > why is ifindex used for an interface.i know it is said > itz for unique identification of device.Can we not do > that using interfac name ?what is significance of > ifindex for an interface. itz just a number associated > wit

Re: user PPP HDLC errors

2001-02-22 Thread Clark Gaylord
authentication completed. Let me know if this sounds consistent with your situation. Clark Gaylord Blacksburg, VA [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: George Fedorenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, 21 February, 2001 06:26 Subject: user PPP HD

Re: Meditation on rl driver

2001-02-08 Thread Clark Gaylord
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 03:32:03PM -0500, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > So I issued an ifconfig and saw that the card was set to media autoselect (NONE). > I tried with > > ifconfig rl1 inet 10.0.0.6 netmask 255.0.0.0 media 10baseT/UTP mediaopt >half-duplex > > but it would not accept th

Re: non-learning bridge for pathological network

2000-12-15 Thread Clark Gaylord
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 11:05:52PM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > The problem with the "just let it be a router" approach is that I > > want all traffic from B to go to A and C, not just that which is > > actually intended for said net (yes all can be considered nets). > > the thing is, i do not s

Re: non-learning bridge for pathological network

2000-12-14 Thread Clark Gaylord
Hello Luigi -- Thank you for your response. Btw, I've been reading over the bridge code ... many thanks for this valuable resource! The problem with the "just let it be a router" approach is that I want all traffic from B to go to A and C, not just that which is actually intended for said net (

non-learning bridge for pathological network

2000-12-14 Thread Clark Gaylord
I am interested in creating a pathological lab network with the following forwarding rules: - three networks (A,B,C) - packets from A or C are forwarded to B - packets from B are forward to both A and C I was thinking of using BRIDGE+ipfw to create this by hacking bridge.c so that all dsts are