On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 16:30:00 -0700 "Adrian Chadd" said
hi!
Hi! Thanks for the quick reply, Adrian!
There's a lot of work to do for this card. The challenge is it's a
completely different thing that our stack needs to understand /and/ it
also kinda pretends to be a PCIe end point too.
Ah, OK
Apologies in advance, should this have gone to @wireless, or ...
That said; I'm performing some R&D on an efficient alternative to gigabit
networking w/o cables. To that end; my Atheros (QCA9005) WiGig (7Gbps tri-band)
half mini-pcie card just arrived, and my target test rig (laptop) will arrive
On Wed, 11 May 2016 11:27:20 -0700 "K. Macy" wrote
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Chris H wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 May 2016 10:25:24 -0700 hiren panchasara
> > wrote
> >
> >> + Kip, Scott.
> >>
> >> On 05/10/16 at 04:46P, David
On Tue, 10 May 2016 10:25:24 -0700 hiren panchasara
wrote
> + Kip, Scott.
>
> On 05/10/16 at 04:46P, David Somayajulu wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > I have a couple of questions on iflib :
> >
> > 1. Are there plans to incorporate iflib into CURRENT. If yes, will it
> > make it into FreeBSD11 rel
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 17:38:23 +0700 Eugene Grosbein wrote
> Forwarding to freebsd-net@
>
> On 15.01.2016 17:29, haku...@yahoo.co.jp wrote:
> > I want to make firewall freebsd 10.1
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > but I can't start on pf
> >
> >
> > I have inserted that
> > " # - PF Firewall
> > p
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 18:14:09 +0200 (CEST) Raimund Sacherer
wrote
> Hello,
>
> We have one firewall (out of a cluster) in a very remote area and it displays
> erratic behaviour. On reboot, sometimes it initialises network port 0
> correctly and sometimes it does not.
>
> I firmly believe it ha
On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 12:25:25 +0100 (CET) el...@sentor.se wrote
> Hi!
>
> q1)
> I assume that libpcap has builtin support for checking if sysctl
> net.bpf.zerocopy_enable is set to 1, and if so uses zerocopy.
> Correct?
>
> q2)
> This should mean that all normal sniffing tools like tcpdump, tshar
On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 19:02:30 +0100 Martin Birgmeier wrote
> Hi,
>
> I have two network interfaces as follows:
>
> sis0: port 0xa400-0xa4ff mem
> 0xd580-0xd5800fff irq 9 at device 9.0 on pci0
> sis1: port 0x9400-0x94ff mem
> 0xd480-0xd4800fff irq 11 at device 12.0 on pci0
>
> When sis
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 16:32:04 -0800 "Chris H" wrote
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2014 14:41:11 -0800 Adrian Chadd wrote
>
> > On 4 December 2014 at 14:24, Martin Hanson
> > wrote: > It is worth mentioning that the ONLY reason why this worked is
> > because > the v
On Thu, 4 Dec 2014 14:41:11 -0800 Adrian Chadd wrote
> On 4 December 2014 at 14:24, Martin Hanson
> wrote: > It is worth mentioning that the ONLY reason why this worked is
> because > the vendor has provided a serial number. Most vendors don't and it
> > would not have worked then.
> >
> > devd
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:59:25AM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>>
>> On 27 Aug 2014, at 06:31 , Jonathan Price wrote:
>>
>> > On 2014-08-27 01:40, Peter Wemm wrote:
>> >> On Tuesday 26 August 2014 10:40:27 free...@jonathanprice.org wrote:
>> >>> Hello,
>> >>>
>> >>> I am configuring a server wi
> On 19/06/14 05:11, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
>
>>
>> FreeBSD doesn't support 6rd. Ironically, pfSense does.
>
> This is not entirely true. 6RD is about establishing a 6to4 tunnel to a
> well-defined tunnel server in your provider's infrastructure, so as long
> as you have the details about the tunn
> On 6/18/2014 10:12 PM, Chris H wrote:
>>> FreeBSD doesn't support 6rd. Ironically, pfSense does.
> >
>> Are you sure?
>> There are even a couple of 6rd ports:
>> net/stf-6rd-kmod
>> and
>> net/u6rd
>> or am I to understand that _withou
h, bluerosetech.com doesn't have any A glue.
Thanks again, and sorry. Nothing personal. :)
--Chris
>
>
> On 6/18/2014 9:36 AM, Chris H wrote:
>> Greetings, I manage a /29 at $home. While I manage _real_ IPv6 on
>> many networks at $work. I'm stuck with 6rd at $home
> On 6/18/2014 9:36 AM, Chris H wrote:
>> Greetings,
>> I manage a /29 at $home. While I manage _real_ IPv6 on many networks
>> at $work. I'm stuck with 6rd at $home. I don't much care for 6rd. It's
>> still pretty much 6to4. But it's all I have t
Greetings,
I manage a /29 at $home. While I manage _real_ IPv6 on many networks
at $work. I'm stuck with 6rd at $home. I don't much care for 6rd. It's
still pretty much 6to4. But it's all I have to work with, given the
CPE's limitations. So, as I'm new to it, I'm not quite sure _which_
address to
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 09:40:53AM -0700, Chris H wrote:
>> > On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 10:49:27PM -0700, Chris H wrote:
>> >> > On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 01:18:19PM -0700, Chris H wrote:
>> >> >> > On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 05:53:51PM -0700, Chris H wr
> On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 10:49:27PM -0700, Chris H wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 01:18:19PM -0700, Chris H wrote:
>> >> > On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 05:53:51PM -0700, Chris H wrote:
>> >> >> > On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 01:40:58PM -0700, Chris H
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 01:18:19PM -0700, Chris H wrote:
>> > On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 05:53:51PM -0700, Chris H wrote:
>> >> > On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 01:40:58PM -0700, Chris H wrote:
>> >> >> > On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 13:19 -0700, Chris H wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 05:53:51PM -0700, Chris H wrote:
>> > On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 01:40:58PM -0700, Chris H wrote:
>> >> > On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 13:19 -0700, Chris H wrote:
>> >> >> [...]
>> >> >> miibus0: on nfe0
>> &
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 01:40:58PM -0700, Chris H wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 13:19 -0700, Chris H wrote:
>> >> [...]
>> >> miibus0: on nfe0
>> >> rlphy0: PHY 0 on miibus0
>> >> rlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 10
>> On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 13:19 -0700, Chris H wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> miibus0: on nfe0
>>> rlphy0: PHY 0 on miibus0
>>> rlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
>>> rlphy1: PHY 1 on miibus0
>> [...]---big-sni
> On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 13:19 -0700, Chris H wrote:
>> [...]
>> miibus0: on nfe0
>> rlphy0: PHY 0 on miibus0
>> rlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
>> rlphy1: PHY 1 on miibus0
> [...]---big-snip--8<---
>> mii
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 07:57:28AM -0700, Chris H wrote:
>> > On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 01:12:20PM -0700, chr...@ultimatedns.net wrote:
>> >> Greetings,
>> >> I'm not sure whether this best belonged on net@, or stable@
>> >> so I'm usi
> hello guys,
>
> i have a question about ip addresses. i know my question is not related to
> freebsd but i googled a lot and found nothing useful and don't know where i
> should ask my question.
>
> i want to know how can i calculate the number of ip addresses in a range?
> for example if i have
>> On 07/10/13 19:47, Guido Falsi wrote:
>>> On 07/10/13 09:04, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 10:28:29PM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a PC with an integrate re ethernet interface, pciconf identifies
> it like this:
>
> re0@pci0:3:0:0: class
> On 07/10/13 19:47, Guido Falsi wrote:
>> On 07/10/13 09:04, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 10:28:29PM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
Hi,
I have a PC with an integrate re ethernet interface, pciconf identifies
it like this:
re0@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x02
> On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 12:51:11 -0800, Chris H wrote:
>
> > in rc.conf, adding the following (order is important!), everything
> > works as expected/desired/anticipated;
> >
> > --- begin rc,conf
> --
weird crap
> (especially when creating cloned devices) can be done at the right
> point before the interface is brought up.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Adrian
Done! Sent it about 45 minutes ago. :)
Thanks again, to all who took the time to help me through this.
--C
rom freebsd.org on 12-12-14. Everything (both as STATIC,
and as DHCP) worked as expected/anticipated.
Is this still worth a PR(1)?
Best wishes, and thanks again, to everyone that took the time to help!
--Chris
>
>
>
>>
>> On 15 December 2012 10:36, Chris H wrote:
>&g
rom freebsd.org on 12-12-14. Everything (both as STATIC,
and as DHCP) worked as expected/anticipated.
Is this still worth a PR(1)?
Best wishes, and thanks again, to everyone that took the time to help!
--Chris
>
>
>
>>
>> On 15 December 2012 10:36, Chris H wrote:
>&g
Hello Warren, and thank you for your reply.
> On Sat, 15 Dec 2012, Chris H wrote:
>
>> Greetings Warren, and thank you for your reply.
>>
>>> On Fri, 14 Dec 2012, Chris H wrote:
>>>
>>>> with: ifconfig_ue0="ether ##:##:##:##:##:##; DHCP"
--
So. It appears this will be the answer. _However_ I can't swear to it
until I spin up && install a (fresh) copy of RELENG_9.
I'll do so, and report back.
Thanks again, for your reply.
--Chris
>
> On 15 December 2012 10:36, Chris H wrote:
>>> On Sat, De
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 10:11:41AM -0800, Chris H wrote:
>> Hello Glen, and thank you for your reply.
>> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:26:06PM -0800, Chris H wrote:
>> >> ifconfig_ue0="DHCP"
>> >> create_args_ue0="eth
Greetings Warren, and thank you for your reply.
> On Fri, 14 Dec 2012, Chris H wrote:
>
>> with: ifconfig_ue0="ether ##:##:##:##:##:##; DHCP"
>> the ether isn't honored (ignored)
>
> Remove the semicolon. I don't know if the order of parameters there
&
Hello Glen, and thank you for your reply.
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:26:06PM -0800, Chris H wrote:
>> ifconfig_ue0="DHCP"
>> create_args_ue0="ether ##:##:##:##:##:##"
>> create_args is simply ignored.
>>
>
> Ignored how? What
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 02:46:33PM -0800, Chris H wrote:
>> OK. So it is possible with BSD. Let's try to make it permanent!
>> adding any of the following attempts failed miserably:
>> ifconfig_ue0="ether ##:##:##:##:##:## DHCP"
>>
>> i
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 02:46:33PM -0800, Chris H wrote:
>> OK. So it is possible with BSD. Let's try to make it permanent!
>> adding any of the following attempts failed miserably:
>> ifconfig_ue0="ether ##:##:##:##:##:## DHCP"
>>
>> i
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Chris H wrote:
>
>> ifconfig_ue0="DHCP"
>> ifconfig_ue0_alias0="ether ##:##:##:##:##:##"
>>
>> So apparently it's not possible (for me) to accomplish this
>> with anything but Linux. Bummer, have u
Greetings, and thank you for taking the time to respond...
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 02:46:33PM -0800, Chris H wrote:
>> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Chris H wrote:
>> >
>> >> > Greetings,
>> >> > I attempted another BSD install on a
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Chris H wrote:
>
>> > Greetings,
>> > I attempted another BSD install on another piece of hardware the
>> > other day. I'm evaluating a different ISP, and the gateway/router/modem
>> > they provided, has 1 e
> Greetings,
> I attempted another BSD install on another piece of hardware the
> other day. I'm evaluating a different ISP, and the gateway/router/modem
> they provided, has 1 ether, which I currently use on my server, and 1
> USB(3) port that I had intended to use with the new install. Problem I
Greetings,
I attempted another BSD install on another piece of hardware the
other day. I'm evaluating a different ISP, and the gateway/router/modem
they provided, has 1 ether, which I currently use on my server, and 1
USB(3) port that I had intended to use with the new install. Problem I
ran into,
43 matches
Mail list logo
