Quoting Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I need a word to use to describe the network view one is currently on..
e.g. if you are usinghe second routing table, you could say I've set xxx to 1
(0 based)..
current;y in my code I'm using 'universe' but I don't like that..
I think you just sa
ee if your latency improves if
you remove all pipe and queue rules (other ipfw rules are OK).
--
Chris Dillon - cdillon(at)wolves.k12.mo.us
FreeBSD: The fastest, most open, and most stable OS on the planet
- Available for IA32, IA64, AMD64, PC98, Alpha, and UltraSPARC architectures
- Power
reboot, and test
again. You should see something between a slight improvement to a
ten-fold improvement.
--
Chris Dillon - cdillon(at)wolves.k12.mo.us
FreeBSD: The fastest, most open, and most stable OS on the planet
- Available for IA32, IA64, AMD64, PC98, Alpha, and UltraSPARC archi
Cs and the
switch.
--
Chris Dillon - cdillon(at)wolves.k12.mo.us
FreeBSD: The fastest, most open, and most stable OS on the planet
- Available for IA32, IA64, AMD64, PC98, Alpha, and UltraSPARC architectures
- PowerPC, ARM, MIPS, and S/390 under development
- http://www.freebsd.org
Q: Becaus
g so many TX and RX rings could be a boon
for QoS applications and routers when it comes to traffic
prioritization.
Thank you for such an in-depth insight!
--
Chris Dillon - cdillon(at)wolves.k12.mo.us
FreeBSD: The fastest and most stable server OS on the planet
- Available for IA32, IA
ips, or has
RealTek improved them to the point where they are actually on par with
their peers? In other words, what's your take on their performance
and reliability compared to the Intel or Broadcom chipsets?
--
Chris Dillon - cdillon(at)wolves.k12.mo.us
FreeBSD: The fastest and most stable
it because it uses kqueue()/kevent()
to do its thing rather than poll()/select().
--
Chris Dillon - cdillon(at)wolves.k12.mo.us
FreeBSD: The fastest and most stable server OS on the planet
- Available for IA32 (Intel x86) and Alpha architectures
- IA64, PowerPC, UltraSPARC, ARM, and S/390 und
right switch you can do this easily. It requires a managed
switch with the ability to have a "monitoring" port. You can copy
traffic to/from one port to another port, or if the switch allows it,
all of the traffic on an entire VLAN to a port.
--
Chris Dillon - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMA
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Earl A. Killian wrote:
> Chris Dillon writes:
> > Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 10:20:39 -0600 (CST)
> > From: Chris Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > If you have the luxury of having more than one IP address available
> > for the
T
address. This is what I've done and it works fine.
--
Chris Dillon - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD: The fastest and most stable server OS on the planet
- Available for IA32 (Intel x86) and Alpha architectures
- IA64, PowerPC, UltraSPARC, and ARM architectu
ut 600 interrupts were
generated), so it definately worked.
If I get real brave I might try it on my router which has mostly
82558B's but also an 82559 or two.
--
Chris Dillon - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD: The fastest and most stable server OS on the planet
- Availab
\drivers\etc, usually C:\WINNT\system32\drivers\etc.
-- Chris Dillon - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD: The fastest and most stable server OS on the planet.
For IA32 and Alpha architectures. IA64, PPC, and ARM under development.
http://www.freebsd.org
To Unsubscribe: s
g pretty much the gamut of network related abuse you could do
to a box -- routing on lots of interfaces, bpfilter (two per interface
in most cases), ipfw, NAT, a fair amount of incoming and outgoing
connections -- except I'm not doing anything Netgraph related
(assuming you might be, being one
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Alex Pilosov wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Chris Dillon wrote:
>
> > Cool, if thats all it will take, I'll give it a try. But, whatever
> > method Compaq/Intel is using doesn't require me to set up the ports on
> > the switch as being part
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Feb 08), Chris Dillon said:
> > > The channel bonding is done using the Cisco fast etherchannel
> > > mechanism. The default hashing mechanism uses the MAC address,
> > > however you can select IP address
where I have two bonded channels from a server, each
port shows a different MAC address. Any idea how that would work?
It would be really cool if you could choose either the EtherChannel
method or some other non-EtherChannel method that will work with other
switches, if we can figure out how it works. :-)
he core, they'll only
work with stranded cable. If they attempt to "straddle" both sides
the core, they should work well with solid cable and most likely
stranded as well.
-- Chris Dillon - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD: The fastest and most stable server OS on th
17 matches
Mail list logo
