I am laughing so hard that I had to open some windows to get more oxygen!
On Friday, August 14, 2015 1:30 PM, Maxim Sobolev
wrote:
Hi guys, unfortunately no, neither reduction of the number of queues from 8
to 6 nor pinning interrupt rate at 2 per queue have not made any
differ
s the pps at 50% cpu usage" is a better question to ask than the one
you're asking.
BC
On Tuesday, August 11, 2015 9:29 PM, Barney Cordoba via freebsd-net
wrote:
Wow, this is really important! if this is a college project, I give you a D.
Maybe a D- because it's a
Wow, this is really important! if this is a college project, I give you a D.
Maybe a D- because it's almost useless information.
You ignore the most important aspect of "performance". Efficiency is arguably
the most important aspect of performance.
1M pps at 20% cpu usage is much better "perform
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 4:28 PM, Kevin Oberman
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 7:10 AM, Barney Cordoba via freebsd-net <
freebsd-net@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 2:19 AM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé <
> oliv...@cochard.me>
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 2:19 AM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 1:15 AM, Barney Cordoba via freebsd-net <
freebsd-net@freebsd.org> wrote:
> What's the point of all of this gobbledygook anyway? Seriously, 99% of the
> world needs a d
What's the point of all of this gobbledygook anyway? Seriously, 99% of the
world needs a driver that passes packets in the most efficient way, and every
time I look at igb and ixgbe it has another 2 heads. It's up to 8 heads, and
none of the things wrong with it have been fixed. This is now even
Are you NOT SHARP ENOUGH to understand that my proposal DOESN'T USE THE NETWORK
STACK? OMFG
Julien, perhaps if people weren't so hostile towards commercial companies
providing ideas for alternative ways of doing things you'd get more input and
more help. Why would I want to help these people?
BC
ding” to break
IPSEC?
Why, in 2015, does anyone think it’s acceptable that the setkey(8) man page
documents, of all things, DES-CBC and HMAC-MD5 for a SA? That’s some kind of
sick joke, right?
This completely flies in the face of RFC 4835.
> On May 4, 2015, at 10:29 AM, Barney Cordoba via
to do something that he recommends to be
done with netmap.
BC
On Monday, May 4, 2015 11:52 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
On Mon, 4 May 2015 15:29:13 +0000, Barney Cordoba via freebsd-net wrote:
> It's not faster than "wedging" into the if_input()s. It simply can't
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Barney Cordoba via freebsd-net <
freebsd-net@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Frankly I'm baffled by netmap. You can easily write a loadable kernel
> module that moves packets from 1 interface to another and hook in the
> firewall
Frankly I'm baffled by netmap. You can easily write a loadable kernel module
that moves packets from 1 interface to another and hook in the firewall; why
would you want to bring them up into user space? It's 1000s of lines of
unnecessary code.
On Sunday, May 3, 2015 3:10 AM, Raimundo S
s the reason that linux
sucks but everyone uses it? 10 years later, some old brain dead mentality.
On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 2:49 PM, John-Mark Gurney
wrote:
Barney Cordoba via freebsd-net wrote this message on Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 06:24
-0700:
> Ok. It was a lot more convenient whe
It's not an either/or. Until last July there was both. Like F'ing Intel isn't
making enough money to pay someone to maintain a FreeBSD version.
On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 2:24 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
> On Aug 13, 2014, at 8:24, Barney Cordoba via freebsd-net
>
seamlessly.
Negative Progress is inevitable.
BC
On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 9:57 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
On 8/12/2014 9:16 PM, Barney Cordoba via freebsd-net wrote:
> I notice that there hasn't been an update in the Intel Download Center since
> July. Is there no official sup
I notice that there hasn't been an update in the Intel Download Center since
July. Is there no official support for 10?
We liked to use the intel stuff as an alternative to the "latest" freebsd code,
but it doesnt compile.
BC
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.
15 matches
Mail list logo
