Here's an on/off topic question i've been wondering about forever...
I always see people replace their IPs with fake replacements.
Is this paranoia really warranted? Why not disconnect the cat5 if you want
to do this?
Or am I not seeing things the right way?
Thanks,
Andrew
__
Hi,
Here is my setup:
fxp0: no ip -> switch -> (computer with ip: 200.200.200.147, gateway
200.200.200.145)
^
|
bridged
|
\/
fxp1: 200.200.200.146, 148, 149, 150 -> ->
(internet)
^
ipf/ipnat
|
\/
fxp2: 192.168.1.1 -> switch -> lots of computers with 192.168.1.x addresses
(all use 1
Hi,
Quoting http://www.moatware.com/support/docbook/faq-bridge.html,
10.8. Why can't hosts on a NATed interface talk to hosts on a bridged
interface?
This frequently happens when someone wants to bridge an interface to their
WAN to use it as a DMZ, and wants to put all of the hosts on their LAN