ption for this but only for the case when the program handles the
interrupt of the PIC. But we do not have assembler coding for doing
this. It would be fine if somebody can point me to a documentation of
the PXENV_UNDI_ISR API used in pxe_netif_receive().
Andreas Longwitz
__
nothing to filter the ARP's.
Andreas Longwitz
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
+ i--;
x = lnk->data.tcp->ack[i];
if (x.active == 1) {
int seq_diff;
Please can somebody review this patch. I am not sure if the same
modification should also be done in the function GetDeltaAckIn().
--
Andreas Longwitz
___
slen=50, delta=5, seq=4a4a5ecb, ip_len=98, new_len=102, index=2
Andreas Longwitz
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
rs. It seems
to me that this does not make a big difference, but maybe I am wrong.
Do you plan to commit your patch ?
Andreas Longwitz
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
st
Di. 17 Apr. 2018 10:47:43 CEST
I like to know if this is intended behaviour.
Andreas Longwitz
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
13UH lo0
192.168.0.0/24 link#1 U em0
192.168.0.114 link#1 UHS lo0
Andreas Longwitz
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
route, tested on FreeBSD 10 r328260.
But deleting the loopback route manually does not work anymore, is this
intended behaviour ?
I would like to control the routing table as much as possible.
Andreas Longwitz
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
UH 0 6366lo0
Also the loopback route can not be deleted manually:
route delete 10.0.0.100 -->
route: writing to routing socket: Address already in use
delete host 10.0.0.100 fib 0: gateway uses the same route
--
Andreas Longwitz
___
e example is mentioned in
lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2012-January/031161.html
for Clients using a VPN with L2TP over IPSec (racoon + mpd5).
Dr. Andreas Longwitz
Data Service GmbH
Beethovenstr. 2A
23617 Stockelsdorf
Amtsgericht Lübeck,
cleared by the epair driver when he transfers a packet from epair0a ro
epair0b.
--
Dr. Andreas Longwitz
Data Service GmbH
Beethovenstr. 2A
23617 Stockelsdorf
Amtsgericht Lübeck, HRB 318 BS
Geschäftsführer: Wilfried Paepcke, Dr. Andreas Longwitz, Josef Flatau
status=2
fi
;;
2)
if [ "${param1}" = "allocated:" ]; then
status=0
if [ "${param2}" = "0" -a "${dir}" = "outbound" ]; then
SA_remote_port=${port}; SA_nat=${nat}
fi
fi
;;
y realize to use my laptop with msk(4) as a link partner for my
soekris box with vr(4).
--
Dr. Andreas Longwitz
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
msk0"
gives always
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT
)
Maybe there is a bug in vr(4) that generates the hang, but why is
negotiation of flowcontrol on vr(4) not done at boot time as shown for
msk(4) ?
If you need more information about the hang let me know.
--
Andreas Longwitz
respect incoming
RX pause frames from the line. I do not need TX flow-control.
> Try attached patch and let me know how it works.
Thanks for your patch. I will test it on next update of my soekris boxes
with sis interfaces. Because they are all remote far away this will need
some
s */
Other network drivers (eg. vr) have this functionality inside, it would
be fine if sis learns flow control too.
---
Andreas Longwitz
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, se
command, but no luck with B-cahnnels. I also tried
isdndebug -u 9 -b 0 -p P_HDLC -b 1 -p P_TRANS -b 2 -p P_TRANS
and
isdndebug -u 9 -b 0 -p P_HDLC -b 1 -p P_TRANS_RING -b 2 -p P_TRANS_RING
with the same result: D-channel ok, B-channels give only X'FF'.
I am not sure, i
t mode, as there is no
>>* port information available in the SP.
>>*/
>> - if (saidx1->mode == IPSEC_MODE_TUNNEL &&
>> + if ((saidx1->mode == IPSEC_MODE_TUNNEL ||
>> + (saidx1->mode == IPSEC_MODE_TRANSP
correct
SA for outgoing packets. I do not know what would be the best place to
store these informations. Any suggestions ?
At the end a question: At the beginning of ip_ipsec_output() in
ip_ipsec.c the flag PACKET_TAG_IPSEC_PENDING_TDB is used, but I can not
find the place where this flag is s
The following reply was made to PR kern/169620; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Andreas Longwitz
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, has...@meridiani.jp
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/169620: [ng] [pf] ng_l2tp incoming packet bypass pf firewall
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 10:39:20 +0200
Hi,
> PF firew
gt; problems to handle fragmented UDP datagrams.
Ok, your final patch workes as expected, all my fxp's can load microcode
and run without hangs od SCB timeouts. I think the PR's kern/103332 and
kern/118909 can be closed now.
Thank you again for investigate in this p
s there are
> differences between LOM and non-LOM implementation(Mine is
> stand-alone PCI NIC). I would be able to selectively allow
> microcode loading after getting compatibility/EEPROM ID word.
Thank you for investigating in this p
ware
and I found versions 3.0.03, 4.0.19 and the newest is 4.2.0.3.
But there never was any dependency between the version of the Intel boot
Agent software and microcode. For chips on the motherboard (LOM) the
tool does not show a version, but booting a server with PXE gives 4.0.17
for the versio
v.fxp.0.bundle_max is irrelevant, the i82250C always needs ca. 91000
irq's for the netperf test. The same number of irq's needs the i82250
with bundle_max=1, but when I set bundle_max=6 (the default), then the
number of irq's for the same test goes down to 91000/7 = 13000.
Regards
mode enabled
fwvpn kernel: fxp0: Microcode loaded, int_delay: 1000 usec
bundle_max: 6
fwvpn kernel: fxp0: SCB timeout: 0x80 0x20 0x90 0x1
fwvpn last message repeated 5 times
Regards,
Andreas Longwitz
___
freebsd-n
lags |= FXP_FLAG_UCODE;
+ bzero(cbp, (uc->length + 2) * sizeof(uint32_t));
}
--
Dr. Andreas Longwitz
Data Service GmbH
Beethovenstr. 2A
23617 Stockelsdorf
Amtsgericht Lübeck, HRB 318 BS
Geschäftsführer: Wilfried Paepcke, Dr. Andreas Longwitz, Josef Flatau
__
for the l2tp netgraph node does the job and you can use pf on
the ng0 interface without any restrections.
Regards,
--
Dr. Andreas Longwitz
Data Service GmbH
Beethovenstr. 2A
23617 Stockelsdorf
Amtsgericht Lübeck, HRB 318 BS
Geschäftsführer: Wilfried Paepcke, Dr. Andreas Longwitz,
27 matches
Mail list logo
