mon which gives outgoing ACKs over the
128K higher preference and buffers the rest of the traffic
(I think).
Would something like this be possible anyhow with our current
Firewall implementation, or would somebody have time and fun
to implement this ??
Andreas ///
--
d outgoing
traffic to this daemon which gives outgoing ACKs over the
128K higher preference and buffers the rest of the traffic
(I think).
Would something like this be possible anyhow with our current
Firewall implementation, or would somebody have time and fun
to implement this ??
Andrea
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 01:19:39AM -0800, Crist J . Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 09:40:23AM +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 11:25:41PM -0800, Crist J . Clark wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 11:56:36AM +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote:
>
>
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 11:25:41PM -0800, Crist J . Clark wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 11:56:36AM +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote:
> > I found a document describing a firewall design only using natd
> > for redirects to internal network resources. (Hi Marshall, therefore
> >
things to take care of, when using FIREWALL_FORWARD ?
Does the logic for firewall rules change, or could I still use the
templates in /etc/rc.firewall ???
Thanks for help.
Thanks
Andreas ///
--
Andreas Klemm - Powered by FreeBSD
Need a magic printfilter today ? http://www.aps
a better firewall
on the new machine and our "simple" template doesn't work out of
the box ...
Or are some kernel options not o.k. for natd ???
What can I give you more on monday or tuesday .. ?
More beef better via personal mail, not mailing-list.
I could arrange ssh access, if yo
