Hi all,
I have started working on a "TCP Daytona" implementation [1]. I'm
quite familiar with TCP/IP in theory, and sort of familiar with the
BSD implementation ideas, but looking into tcp_input and tcp_output is
always a mistic experience ;-) I tried to understand how I could
generate multiple (e
lean-am
+
+distclean: distclean-am
+
+distclean-am: clean-am distclean-generic distclean-libtool
+
+dvi: dvi-am
+
+dvi-am:
+
+info: info-am
+
+info-am:
+
+install-data-am:
+
+install-exec-am:
+
+install-info: install-info-am
+
+install-man:
+
+installcheck-am:
+
+maintainer-clean: maintainer-clean-a
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 03:25:27PM -0800, Peter Heerboth wrote:
> I'm not a zeroconf expert per se, but I would love to see FreeBSD have
> a great zeroconf implementation. Here are some things to think about.
>
> >
> >If your first implementation happens to leave the interface with a
> >169.254
On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 03:56:33PM -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> >Just to check my assumptions: is it reasonable to assume autoipd
> >has total control over the 169.254 block? I don't want to have to
> >bother about preserving any existing address in that range etc.
>
> No, it is not reasonable. A
On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 01:47:19PM -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> If your first implementation happens to leave the interface with a 169.254
> IP address, it's doing something it shouldn't, however that is likely to be
> mostly harmless until you or someone has a chance to improve the
> implementa
On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 04:41:17AM -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Andrea Campi wrote:
> [ ... ]
> >The way I'm addressing this is to have autoipd use SIOCAIFADDR
> >and manage exactly one address in the 169.254/16 block. This
> >means you will ALWAYS have an IP address
Hi all,
just a quick note to let concerned parties know I have started
working on the howl port. As mentioned on the dingo page, the goal
is to have a fully working BSD-licensed implementation of zeroconf.
At the moment I have autoipd working for me and slightly tested; I
plan to do more tests du
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 09:24:05PM +0100, Max Laier wrote:
> The attached patch (http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/in.c.patch) derived
> from
> WIDE via OpenBSD in.c, rev 1.21 improves the handling of automatic prefix
> routes.
Sounds like a very useful change indeed.
One comment though:
> @@
[please keep me Cc'd as I'm not currently subscribed]
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 11:00:16AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > So, questions: am I doing anything wrong? Is this supposed to work? Is
> > ath0 somehow mangling the data it sends to netgraph?
> > I'd be willing to put some effort in this i
[please keep me Cc'd as I'm not currently subscribed]
Hi,
I'm setting up a firewall/access point based on -CURRENT. I'm trying to set
things up so that wireless clients can access the internal network via PPPoE.
I admit to being a novice in this area, but I could set it up quite nicely
for client
10 matches
Mail list logo
