Hi,
sorry jails@ resend after subscription to net@ to have this mail not rejected.
Any opinion about logging the jid and uid in case a jailed process is
causing listen queue overflows? Any strong objections about committing
something like this?
Code (tabs are most probably mangled up):
---
Hi,
I updated from r347365 to r349853. Now I get a panic on epair destroy
(one end needs to be in a jail, and inside the jail an IP address
needs to be assigned to the epair. If no ifconfig is used inside the
jail, there is no panic.
Another user reported something similar (but for him it
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 11:26:13 -0500 John Baldwin wrote:
> The current setsockopt() wrapper for the Linux ABI claims that Linux
> and FreeBSD use the same values for TCP socket options. This is true
> for TCP_NODELAY and TCP_MAXSEG but not for any other options. This
> patch adds a mapping routin
Quoting Bruce Simpson (from Wed, 04 Mar 2009
11:49:03 +):
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
...
Is this supposed to make multicast work in a jail? In the past I
tried some simple tests (e.g. mtest(8)), but I wasn't able to
receive anything in a jail (this test was triggered by the
Quoting Bruce Simpson (from Wed, 04 Mar 2009
01:47:58 +):
Hi all,
I am making patches available against 8-CURRENT to do IGMPv3 and
Source Specific Multicast in the IP stack:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bms/stage/igmpv3/
Is this supposed to make multicast work in a jail? In the pas
Quoting "Chagin Dmitry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Wed, 17 Sep 2008
23:02:30 +0400):
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 10:38:01PM +0400, Chagin Dmitry wrote:
Please review, any comment will be helpful.
I did just a very quick look...
@@ -978,9 +1072,13 @@ linux_sendmsg(struct thread *td, struct
li
Hi,
will someone port the NetBSD SoC project which implemented ECN to FreeBSD?
If not, could someone please write up a nice text with some pointers
for our ideas list?
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Any sufficiently advanced bug becomes a feature.
http://www.Leidinger.netAlexander @ Leidinger.net:
Hi,
I just found this in the comments on slashdot
(http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=174457&cid=14515105)
---snip---
The trouble with the Nagle algorithm
I really should fix the bad interaction between the "Nagle algorithm" and
"delayed ACKs". Both ideas went into TCP around the sam
Hi,
does someone know about a fix for the net/acx100 port to let it compile
on 6.0? It seems the NIC API has changed and the port doesn't know how
to cope with this.
A pointer to a diff which shows how to adapt another driver to 6.0
would also be ok, if it's just some kind of mechanical translati
Hi,
please CC me, I'm not (yet) subscribed.
I've booted a P4 with an icc compiled kernel, and the network is
missing, even a ping to 127.0.0.1 doesn't work (no firewall). I see the
outgoing echo requests with tcpdump, but that's all.
Is someone out there who can guide me through the network stac
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 01:06:07 -0700
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I got this on 4.8-STABLE from July 16 the other day while playing with
> dummynet configuration.
>
> I also managed to put tun0 into an unusable state on my firewall
> (running ppp(8) with netgraph pppoe on a dsl modem)
Hi,
[please CC me]
I noticed this log message on a 4.9-RC (src from ~Oct 1):
---snip---
Oct 9 15:57:42 Andro-Beta /kernel: dummynet: OUCH! pipe should have been idle!
Oct 9 15:57:56 Andro-Beta /kernel: dummynet: OUCH! pipe should have been idle!
---snip---
I looked a little bit into the code,
On 3 Apr, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 04:13:27PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>> On 2 Apr, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>>
>> > OK, we fixed the "ifconfig down" case already. The attached patch alters
>> > inet routing code so that
On 2 Apr, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> OK, we fixed the "ifconfig down" case already. The attached patch alters
> inet routing code so that it does not delete routes with the "default"
> source address of 0.0.0.0; ip_output() will take care of choosing the
> right address. Please let me know if it
On 31 Mär, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
[-isdn CCed,]
Dear -isdn readers, we are talking about the actual behavior of
-current, see -current and -net for the beginning of the discussion.
>> >> If I use
>> >> route add default -interface isp1
>> >> I wan't to have the packets routed trough isp1. I do
On 30 Mär, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> [Redirected to -net]
Please CC me, I'm not subscribed to -net. Thanks.
>> If I use
>> route add default -interface isp1
>> I wan't to have the packets routed trough isp1. I don't care about how
>> the routing table is held consistent, but I if the route is d
16 matches
Mail list logo
