+ kp@ A very interesting question. I think that's because, ng_ether(4) intercepts L2 traffic before it hits the firewall. pf(4) can intercept L2 traffic, but I'm not sure that it can then filter it by L3/L4.https://reviews.freebsd.org/D31737 Maybe kp@ will clarify this issue? 31.10.2024, 18:32, "Pa
aleksandr.fedorov_itglobal.com added inline comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
> iflib.c:2916
>
> #define TXD_NOTIFY_COUNT(txq) (((txq)->ift_size / (txq)->ift_update_freq)-1)
> static inline qidx_t
I am worried that if the user sets the value to 1, then this will lead to
division by zero and to kern
aleksandr.fedorov_itglobal.com added a comment.
ping?
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19422/new/
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19422
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: aleksandr.fedorov_itglobal.com,
aleksandr.fedorov_itglobal.com added a comment.
Can anyone commit this patch?
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19422/new/
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19422
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: aleksan
aleksandr.fedorov_itglobal.com marked an inline comment as done.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19422/new/
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19422
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: aleksandr.fedorov_itglob
aleksandr.fedorov_itglobal.com updated this revision to Diff 59753.
aleksandr.fedorov_itglobal.com added a comment.
VXLAN encapsulate ethernet frames within UDP/IP packets. So, we can calculate
maximum overhead for IPv4:
- IP_MAXPACKET = 65K - constant from netinet/ip.h.
- Maximum IP he
aleksandr.fedorov_itglobal.com marked an inline comment as done.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19422/new/
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19422
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: aleksandr.fedorov_itglob
aleksandr.fedorov_itglobal.com updated this revision to Diff 59684.
aleksandr.fedorov_itglobal.com edited the test plan for this revision.
aleksandr.fedorov_itglobal.com added reviewers: krion, jhb.
aleksandr.fedorov_itglobal.com added a comment.
This revision now requires review to proceed.
I
aleksandr.fedorov_itglobal.com edited the test plan for this revision.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20824/new/
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20824
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: aleksandr.fedorov_
aleksandr.fedorov_itglobal.com created this revision.
aleksandr.fedorov_itglobal.com added reviewers: vmaffione, jhb, bz.
REVISION SUMMARY
It is very useful to be able to create virtual networks, such as: VM1 - VALE
switch - if_vlan - ix0 -- physical network -- ix0 - if_vlan - VALE switch - VM2
aleksandr.fedorov_itglobal.com created this revision.
aleksandr.fedorov_itglobal.com added reviewers: bryanv, hrs, network.
Herald added a subscriber: ae.
REVISION SUMMARY
It seems, there are no reason to prevent setting MTU more than 1500 bytes.
MTU greater than 1500 gives a significant incre
11 matches
Mail list logo