alc added a comment.
Have you looked at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1945, in particular, the most
recent postings by sbahra_repnop.org? It's not clear to me that these changes
will address the problem described in sbahra_repnop.org's postings. That said,
your proposed changes do correct t
The reimplementation of contigmalloc(9) in HEAD and RELENG_7 makes the
allocation of physically contiguous jumbo frames a real possibility. If
you're using jumbo frames, please test the attached patch. Andrew
Gallatin has already tested this patch with mxge and asked that I bump
__FreeBSD_ver
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 02:18:14AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> properly cover the socket buffer for operations that need locking.
>
Just to be clear, your point is that soreadable() and sowriteable()
should be performed with the corresponding socket buffer locked.
Correct? If so, yes, pleas
