On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Adam Vande More wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm looking for an internal Wi-Fi NIC with support for
> > >
> > > 1. 802.11n or better 802.11ac
> > > 2. HOSTAP mode
> > > 3. 5 GHz band (bet
On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 10:02 PM, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> I'm looking for an internal Wi-Fi NIC with support for
>
> 1. 802.11n or better 802.11ac
> 2. HOSTAP mode
> 3. 5 GHz band (better both 2GHz and 5GHz).
>
> for an AP running FreeBSD.
>
> A USB NIC would do too, but a PCI
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Alan Somers wrote:
> I'm sorry for you Ryan; this sounds like a doozy. I know you said that the
> customer is unwilling to change, but would they consider using a lagg(4)
> interface? Using lagg with laggproto=failover is designed to solve exactly
> this problem
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 2:38 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette
wrote:
>
> I need to buy a PCI-E ethernet card. It won't really matter if it
> is 10/100/1000 or just 10/100 but it has to work with FreeBSD at a
> minimum. It would be Nice if it was also supported by Linux and
> Windoze7, but that isn't real
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 2:35 PM, DES <3...@inx.su> wrote:
> thank you for the response Kevin and Bakul,
>
> but neither tcptrace nor ethereal/wireshark is what I'm looking for. As I
> said, the application I was using was drawing single IP packet header
> similar to what is presented in RFC791 -
>
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 01/15/16 16:00, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 15:44:42 +0100 Guido Falsi
> > wrote about Re: upnp/dlna:
> >
> > GF> Could you try the patch here:
> > GF> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205430
> >
> > I'll tr
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Alan Somers wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Russell L. Carter
> wrote:
> > On 12/17/14 18:30, Adam McDougall wrote:
> >>
> >> On 12/17/2014 19:47, Russell L. Carter wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 12/17/14 16:07, Rick Macklem wrote:
> >>
> >>
>
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
>
>
> The irq-igb1 clibs to top every now and then (always less than 1% cpu
> usage though), but there is never much cpu usage shown for any task.
> However, the overall load is significant. What might the system be doing?
>
>
http://lists.freebs
)
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2013-July/074377.html
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
SD Box with PfSense. It
has a lot of managment features built in so if you're looking to get those
without a big time sink otherwise, something like that is the way to go.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fre
>
> > And I'm connected.
> > Couldn't manage that with BSD. What must I do? Is it even possible?
> > If so, can it be assigned for use on a permanent basis?
> >
> > Thank you for all your time, and consideration.
>
>
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=freebsd+change+
ms but cannot be
avoided. On faster machines (e.g. a Pentium II), the performance
impact
is much less noticeable.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ate 0
bwn0: need multicast update callback
bwn0: RX decryption attempted (old 0 keyidx 0x2)
bwn0: RX decryption attempted (old 0 keyidx 0x2)
If someone would like to tackle this, I can provide access to the hardware
or I will donate the card to the person. Whatever works.
--
Adam Vande
Hm, I guess I can't read. It was bwn, not bwi. Working now.
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:
> I have a laptop trying to install on. This appears to be the only hangup:
>
> none1@pci0:4:0:0: class=0x028000 card=0x000c1028 chip=0x431514e4
>
gt;From what I can tell, bwi supports this family but not this model. Anyone
know how to enable it?
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail t
several reasons, but ultimately
the fact it's java based and resource intensive required me to go with
zabbix. Zabbix is good too, except for some annoying, non-critical
interface bugs.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing
sc_fail2: 3431
>
>
Maybe try EM_MULTIQUEUE?
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2011-April/028664.html
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
sets.
FreeBSD galacticdominator.com 8.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE #5: Thu
Nov 25 19:14:00 CST 2010
a...@galacticdominator.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
amd64
This nic has been working on the stable branch for over a year from when I
aquired the system and I've never had an issu
0.326 msec
Seq inner: 2048 iter in 0.691691 sec =0.338 msec
Transfer rates:
outside: 102400 kbytes in 0.722864 sec = 141659 kbytes/sec
middle:102400 kbytes in 0.813619 sec = 125857 kbytes/sec
inside:102400 kbytes in 0.83812
his with FreeBSD, sorry.
>>
>> Juli.
>>
>>
>
I really don't need anything, I just wanted to know if the steps I'd taken
should work and it's a bug, or if I still need some learnin.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Juli Mallett wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 13:21, Adam Vande More
> wrote:
> > Am I doing something wrong here?
>
> That depends on what you're expecting to happen. What do you think
> tap(4) does and what are you trying t
expected.
FreeBSD it.digitecinc.net 8.0-BETA4 FreeBSD 8.0-BETA4 #2: Mon Sep 7
11:26:25 CDT 2009
vandemo...@it.digitecinc.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
i386
Repost from questions@ several days ago.
Thanks,
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-net
22 matches
Mail list logo
