Re: IPSEC MTU routing issue

On 01/23/15 15:13, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: Hi. On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 03:16:21PM +0100, Andrei Brezan wrote: Weird subject, maybe. I'm running FreeBSD-10.0-RELEASE with PF as firewall and racoon for IPSEC. The IPSEC tunnel is between the FreeBSD box and a Fortinet appliance. The

IPSEC MTU routing issue

vlan103 host "a.b.c.d" 00:00:00.00 IP "a.b.c.d" > "e.f.g.h": ICMP echo request, id 21034, seq 1, length 1108 00:00:00.000109 IP "e.f.g.h" > "a.b.c.d": ICMP echo reply, id 21034, seq 1, length 1108 Thanks, -- Andrei ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

RTL8168/8111 re PHY write failed

ost immediately after reboot. Please CC me if replying, I am not subscribed to the list. BR. Andrei R. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

tcp/ip stack sending icmp "ttl exceeded in traffic" back through gre \w ipsec-esp encryption tunnels.

should have an ICMP "TTL exceeded in traffic" returned by RouterB have no effect. Of course, TTL3 packets are being returned by hostB through RouterB and back through the tunnel. Any plans from tcp/ip stack developers regarding this behavior ? -- Regards, Andrei Manescu Links:

Re: Choosing CPU for router

2010/3/16 Jon Otterholm : > Hi. > > In the process to build a new router and want to choose the best possible > CPU for the job. > > Narrowed it down to the following: > > Intel Q9650 3,0Ghz > Intel i7-965/975 3,2Ghz/3,33Ghz > > What would be the benefit from a Xeon? > > Motherboard: Supermicro X8S

Re: Choosing CPU for router

2010/3/16 Andrei Kolu : > 2010/3/16 Jon Otterholm : >> Hi. >> >> In the process to build a new router and want to choose the best possible >> CPU for the job. >> >> Narrowed it down to the following: >> >> Intel Q9650 3,0Ghz >> Intel i7-965/

Re: VLAN problems

> Alexandre Biancalana wrote: > > This server is an Dell Power Edge 1950, QuadCore 2.83, 2Gb Ram, one > > bce gigabit interface connected to a gigabit port of a Cisco 4500 in > > trunk mode. Why you are using trunk mode? IIRC then "trunk" is used only between Cisco switches and routers and your

Re: Ethernet Bonding

On Monday 03 September 2007 15:16:20 Christian Brueffer wrote: > On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 01:59:47PM +0200, mer mite wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I'm looking for a way to provide ethernet interface bonding in FreeBSD > > similar to ipmp in Solaris or just ethernet bonding in Linux. Don't want > > to

mounted ntfs partition shared with samba not accessible

I can access "test" mount from other FreeBSD without any problem but have no access to "moovid" share. With Konqueror fish://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/usr/home/antik/moovid I can see all files. Is it possible at all share ntfs volumes with samba on FreeBSD box? samba-3.0.25a,1 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5 # mo

two public ip addresses on one interface

Hello, If I want to put two public IP addresses, with different subnetmasks (my ISP is changing some subnets and for two months I will be able to use two public ip addresses) on the same interface (xl0) my rc.conf shuld look like this: ifconfig_xl0="inet 84.125.210.108 netmask 255.255.252.0" i

working 11g adapter pci

d you please let me know? As some other adapters that use the acx111 (like D-Link 520+ I also own) have problems with FreeBSD... please CC me on answers, as I am not subscribed to this list. tks, ANdrei --- The problem with our world is stupidity. I'm not saying there should be a capital

Re: initial congestion window

environments to see what effect does it have). Andrei On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Jonathan Lemon wrote: > Actually, you could argue that both should be changed to > 2-3 segments, see http://www.aciri.org/floyd/tcp_init_win.html > -- > Jonathan > > In article >[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > you

Re: initial congestion window

If there are no strong opinions supporting this feature, should we then ask the developers to set the default inital window to two segments when talking to local IPs? It would help to keep the image of FreeBSD as a 'conformant system' with regard to TCP specs. rgds, Andrei On Wed, 1

initial congestion window

ngestion on Ethernet, packets queues build up at the network interfaces in hosts and agressive TCP start-up behaviour can further increase congestion losses What are your thoughts on this? Andrei tcp_output.c: int ss_fltsz = 1; SYSCTL_INT(_net_inet_tcp, OID_AUTO, slowstart_flightsize, CTLFLAG_R

Hacked computer

Hello everyone, I have a problem, in the morning someone hacked into my computer at home. It is ADSL Gateway running FreeBSD 3.4 , root password is changed by hacker. Can anyone tell where on the system I can find some tracks of a hacker? What should I check first? Which log files? Anyone? Please