On Monday, May 19, 2025 6:09:08 PM UTC Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> > Am 19.05.2025 um 19:28 schrieb Paul Vixie :
> >
> > If we move all member ifaddrs to the bridge itself, then will arp requests
> > always have to be broadcast on all member interfaces? If so this is
> > intolerable fr
Hi all,
> Am 19.05.2025 um 19:28 schrieb Paul Vixie :
>
> If we move all member ifaddrs to the bridge itself, then will arp requests
> always have to be broadcast on all member interfaces? If so this is
> intolerable from a security perspective, a complete nonstarter.
I am not quite sure I fol
If we move all member ifaddrs to the bridge itself, then will arp requests
always have to be broadcast on all member interfaces? If so this is intolerable
from a security perspective, a complete nonstarter.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=286762
--- Comment #1 from aaron.s...@baesystems.com ---
Created attachment 260550
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=260550&action=edit
force igc link status check
Here's a patch that will force the link status check when t
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254445
Lexi Winter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|n...@freebsd.org |i...@freebsd.org
--
You are receiv
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254675
Kurt Jaeger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICMP Unreach needfrag is|ICMP Unreach needfrag is
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254675
m...@luckie.org.nz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@luckie.org.nz
--- Comment