https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=285492
--- Comment #2 from Konstantin Belousov ---
It could be fixed by 89e0e3814e8ca205db7523f6ce6c63cebe4bfb0d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=285492
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|n...@freebsd.org
--
You are receiv
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=280390
--- Comment #24 from Tatsuki Makino ---
(In reply to Andrey V. Elsukov from comment #22 & #23)
> I still doesn't understand your problem.
Me too :)
As a result of being stingy with the money I pay upstream (removing services
like phone a
On 4/9/25 13:19, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 4/9/25 13:10, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 4/9/25 12:51, Ronald Klop wrote:
Hi,
Next to hostuuid you could add a jailname in the mix.
That is what ether_gen_addr(9) does to make it easier to prevent
collisions while copying jails around or run a jail on a read
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=280390
--- Comment #23 from Andrey V. Elsukov ---
(In reply to Tatsuki Makino from comment #21)
> The results of ipfw -D show indicated that more than 2 packets were captured
> due to the ipv6-icmp rule, this patch may be meaningful :)
When you
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=280390
--- Comment #22 from Andrey V. Elsukov ---
I still doesn't understand your problem. NPTv6 is stateless and doesn't need
any keep-state rules. We use NPTv6 many years and it works as is without any
patches.
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=280390
--- Comment #21 from Tatsuki Makino ---
(In reply to Tatsuki Makino from comment #20)
In the end, I came back to the method of using this :)
I wanted to keep one_pass enabled, so I used a strange method with dynamic
rules, but with the fol
