https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=281125
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|n...@freebsd.org
--
You are receiv
Hello,
Drew Gallatin and I have been working on an implementation of SO_SPLICE,
an interface which allows TCP connections to be spliced together. This
is intended for use in proxy applications to reduce the overhead of
copying data between connections.
At the moment the interface isn't widely us
Van: mike tancsa
Datum: donderdag, 29 augustus 2024 20:51
Aan: FreeBSD Net
Onderwerp: dropping udp fragments with ipfw
I was working on some firewall rules to drop large UDP fragment attacks and
noticed there is no easy way to drop fragments based on port ? e.g. if someone
sends a UDP packet
On 8/29/2024 3:45 PM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 8:52 PM mike tancsa wrote:
But this would kill all UDP fragments. If the host has some other
UDP
application that needs to deal with fragmented packets, is there a
way
to get around that and only dr
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 8:52 PM mike tancsa wrote:
> But this would kill all UDP fragments. If the host has some other UDP
> application that needs to deal with fragmented packets, is there a way
> to get around that and only drop packets with a certain port in the
> first fragment ?
>
>
When a
I was working on some firewall rules to drop large UDP fragment attacks
and noticed there is no easy way to drop fragments based on port ? e.g.
if someone sends a UDP packet of 1400 bytes, I can drop it with
TARGET=192.168.1.1
ipfw add 5 deny log udp from any 53 to $TARGET
But if that packet
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279245
Dr. Uwe Meyer-Gruhl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Closed
Resolution|--
On Wed 28 Aug 08:40, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 1:21 AM yann.mas...@thehomecave.fr <
> yann.mas...@thehomecave.fr> wrote:
>
> > After configuring interfaces and routes, and triggering a 'service netif
> > restart && service routing restart' is there a way to wait for the 'carrie
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275001
Mark Johnston changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|In Progress |Closed
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279245
CrazyWolf13 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||freebsdforums.lurch729@pass
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278306
--- Comment #11 from Chris Hutchinson ---
(In reply to Bjoern A. Zeeb from comment #10)
I think you're on the right track, Bjoern.
But as I examined this approach, I discovered what may be
hints to the problem here:
libexec/rc/netif
@ 152
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278306
Bjoern A. Zeeb changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@freebsd.org
--
You are rece
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=280701
--- Comment #61 from Natalino Picone ---
(In reply to doktornotor from comment #60)
Sorry for the missing details. This is a very long thread, and it's unclear
whether an official FreeBSD patch is now in the base or not to fix the issues
c
13 matches
Mail list logo
