[Bug 166724] if_re(4): watchdog timeout

2024-03-17 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166724 v...@fbsd.ru changed: What|Removed |Added CC||v...@fbsd.ru --- Comment #115 from v

Problem reports for n...@freebsd.org that need special attention

2024-03-17 Thread bugzilla-noreply
To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and ob

Re: Request for Testing: TCP RACK

2024-03-17 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Hello, > I don't have the full context, but it seems like the complaint is a > performance regression in bonnie++ and perhaps other things when tcp_hpts is > loaded, even when it is not used. Is that correct? > > If so, I suspect its because we drive the tcp_hpts_softclock() routine from > use

Re: Request for Testing: TCP RACK

2024-03-17 Thread tuexen
> On 17. Mar 2024, at 16:39, Drew Gallatin wrote: > > I don't have the full context, but it seems like the complaint is a > performance regression in bonnie++ and perhaps other things when tcp_hpts is > loaded, even when it is not used. Is that correct? Correct. > > If so, I suspect its becau

Re: Request for Testing: TCP RACK

2024-03-17 Thread Drew Gallatin
Resending with the patch as an attachment. Drew On Sun, Mar 17, 2024, at 11:39 AM, Drew Gallatin wrote: > I don't have the full context, but it seems like the complaint is a > performance regression in bonnie++ and perhaps other things when tcp_hpts is > loaded, even when it is not used. Is th

Re: Request for Testing: TCP RACK

2024-03-17 Thread Drew Gallatin
I don't have the full context, but it seems like the complaint is a performance regression in bonnie++ and perhaps other things when tcp_hpts is loaded, even when it is not used. Is that correct? If so, I suspect its because we drive the tcp_hpts_softclock() routine from userret(), in order to

Re: Request for Testing: TCP RACK

2024-03-17 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Hello, > > - I can't remember better tests to do as I can feel the entire OS is > > being slow, without errors, just slow. > This is interesting. It seems a consequence on loading TCPHPTS, not actually > using it. Exactly, just loading module and not using it by setting sysctl. > I have CCed Dre

Re: Request for Testing: TCP RACK

2024-03-17 Thread tuexen
> On 16. Mar 2024, at 21:29, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > >> Just to double check: you only load the tcp_rack. You don't run >> sysctl net.inet.tcp.functions_default=rack > > I'm not using sysctl, just loading module. And you also don't have net.inet.tcp.functions_default=rack in /etc/sysctl.conf This