> Just to double check: you only load the tcp_rack. You don't run
> sysctl net.inet.tcp.functions_default=rack
I'm not using sysctl, just loading module.
> What does "poudriere testport net/gitup" do? Only build stuff or does is
> also download something?
>
> What does bonnie++ do?
poudriere is
> On 16. Mar 2024, at 20:06, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
>
>>> Will update amd64 laptop to main-n268827-75464941dc17 (Mar 16) and test it.
>> Please do so...
>
> @main-n268827-75464941dc17 GENERIC-NODEBUG amd64
>
> Ok, I think I have here some numbers related to disk performance being
> affected by tc
> > Will update amd64 laptop to main-n268827-75464941dc17 (Mar 16) and test it.
> Please do so...
@main-n268827-75464941dc17 GENERIC-NODEBUG amd64
Ok, I think I have here some numbers related to disk performance being
affected by tcp_rack that somehow is messing with something.
NOTES:
- test [1]
> On 16. Mar 2024, at 15:00, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
>
>> If you load tcp_rack via kldload, tcphtps get loaded automatically.
>> If you load if via /boot/loader.conf, you need to have
>> tcphpts_load="YES"
>> in addition to
>> tcp_rack_load="YES"
>
> As of my tests, loader.conf: tcp_rack_load="YES"
> If you load tcp_rack via kldload, tcphtps get loaded automatically.
> If you load if via /boot/loader.conf, you need to have
> tcphpts_load="YES"
> in addition to
> tcp_rack_load="YES"
As of my tests, loader.conf: tcp_rack_load="YES" loads tcphtps.ko auto:
31 0x81f53000545e0 tcp
> On 16. Mar 2024, at 11:59, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
>
>>> Resuming I only need to add:
>>>
>>> options TCPHPTS
>>>
>>> Is this correct?
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, that will probably fix it. According to a comment in
>> /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_hpts.c it adds a high precision timer
>> system for t
> > Resuming I only need to add:
> >
> > options TCPHPTS
> >
> > Is this correct?
> >
>
> Yeah, that will probably fix it. According to a comment in
> /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_hpts.c it adds a high precision timer
> system for tcp, used by RACK and BBR.
As tuexen said, on main, loader.con
On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 10:11:22 +
Nuno Teixeira wrote:
> (...)
>
> > These entries are missing in GENERIC:
> >
> > makeoptions WITH_EXTRA_TCP_STACKS=1
>
> From
> https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=3a338c534154164504005beb00a3c6feb03756cc
> WITH_EXTRA_TCP_STACKS was dropped.
>
> > opti
> On 16. Mar 2024, at 11:11, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
>
> (...)
>
>> These entries are missing in GENERIC:
>>
>> makeoptions WITH_EXTRA_TCP_STACKS=1
>
> From
> https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=3a338c534154164504005beb00a3c6feb03756cc
> WITH_EXTRA_TCP_STACKS was dropped.
>
>> options
(...)
> These entries are missing in GENERIC:
>
> makeoptions WITH_EXTRA_TCP_STACKS=1
>From
>https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=3a338c534154164504005beb00a3c6feb03756cc
WITH_EXTRA_TCP_STACKS was dropped.
> options TCPHPTS
That's the missing option in GENERIC that could lead t
On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 09:49:24 +
Nuno Teixeira wrote:
> Hello Gary,
>
> Nice that you found this.
>
> tcp_tack manual doesn't mention that we need extra config in kernel
> but it loads module and it is shown in sysctl
> net.inet.tcp.functions_available without errors.
>
> I will add missing con
Hello Gary,
Nice that you found this.
tcp_tack manual doesn't mention that we need extra config in kernel
but it loads module and it is shown in sysctl
net.inet.tcp.functions_available without errors.
I will add missing config to GENERIC and see how it goes.
Cheers,
Gary Jennejohn escreveu (
Followed man tcp_rack:
loader.conf:
tcp_rack_load="YES"
sysctl.conf:
net.inet.tcp.functions_default=rack
poudriere have restricted access to network, usually for fetch distfiles.
escreveu (sábado, 16/03/2024 à(s) 08:41):
>
> > On 16. Mar 2024, at 08:57, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
> >
> > Hello all,
On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 09:41:13 +0100
tue...@freebsd.org wrote:
> > On 16. Mar 2024, at 08:57, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > On a laptop i7/16MB ram, desktop use and port testing (poudriere) I've
> > noticed that all operations on OS was increased by 3 to 5 times
> > longer.
> > ex
> On 16. Mar 2024, at 08:57, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> On a laptop i7/16MB ram, desktop use and port testing (poudriere) I've
> noticed that all operations on OS was increased by 3 to 5 times
> longer.
> examples:
> - firefox took way long time to open
> - poudriere testport tooked
Hello all,
On a laptop i7/16MB ram, desktop use and port testing (poudriere) I've
noticed that all operations on OS was increased by 3 to 5 times
longer.
examples:
- firefox took way long time to open
- poudriere testport tooked up to 3 times longer to finished
make.conf:
KERNCONF=GENERIC-NODEBUG
16 matches
Mail list logo
