04.11.21 01:01, Mike Karels пишет:
I have a pending change to stop using class A/B/C netmasks when setting
an interface address without an explicit mask, and instead to use a default
mask (24 bits). A question has arisen as to what the default mask should
be for loopback interfaces. The standar
I have a pending change to stop using class A/B/C netmasks when setting
an interface address without an explicit mask, and instead to use a default
mask (24 bits). A question has arisen as to what the default mask should
be for loopback interfaces. The standard 127.0.0.1 is added with an 8 bit
Hello
After survey about solution for Broadcom bnxt driver issue with promiscous
mode. I am not found any normal solution with that situation.
Only workaround to using promiscous mode to have normal operations with these
cards. This isn't normal by me!
I look and do some debug on bnxt driver.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=258849
Mateusz Guzik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|n...@freebsd.org |m...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #9 f
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=258849
--- Comment #8 from Mateusz Guzik ---
Well I'm going to have to write one first. ;)
I'll try to do it today.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=258849
--- Comment #7 from Andrey V. Elsukov ---
(In reply to Mateusz Guzik from comment #4)
I'm agree with your solution, will you publish the full diff?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
