[Bug 218579] bge(4): Wake on Lan (WoL) does not work

2021-09-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218579 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-patch |needs-qa See Also|

[Bug 118111] rc: network.subr Add MAC address based interface renaming

2021-09-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118111 Santiago Martinez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s...@codenetworks.net --- Comm

Re: TCP connection ignore RST

2021-09-05 Thread Eugene Grosbein
04.09.2021 6:37, Rozhuk Ivan wrote: > Hi! > > > I have strange case: FreeBSD 12.2 ignore TCP RST from windows host and > continue retransmitting packets. > sockstat show that socket connected even after many tcp rst packets received. > > Any ideas how to fix it? First make sure your packet fil

Problem reports for n...@freebsd.org that need special attention

2021-09-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and ob

[Bug 240944] em(4): Crash with Intel 82571EB NIC with AMD Piledriver and Steamroller APUs

2021-09-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240944 --- Comment #13 from Kevin Bowling --- (In reply to Ace from comment #12) > ecap 0001[100] = AER 1 0 fatal 1 non-fatal 2 corrected You have some fatal PCI errors occurring on the card, and that looks consistent with the other pciconf repor

[Bug 240944] em(4): Crash with Intel 82571EB NIC with AMD Piledriver and Steamroller APUs

2021-09-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240944 --- Comment #12 from Ace --- (In reply to Kevin Bowling from comment #8) Thanks, I've attached them. I've also included pciconf -l -vbc output for good measure as asked in comment #1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the ass

[Bug 240944] em(4): Crash with Intel 82571EB NIC with AMD Piledriver and Steamroller APUs

2021-09-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240944 --- Comment #11 from Ace --- Created attachment 227690 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=227690&action=edit pciconf output -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 240944] em(4): Crash with Intel 82571EB NIC with AMD Piledriver and Steamroller APUs

2021-09-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240944 --- Comment #10 from Ace --- Created attachment 227689 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=227689&action=edit ifconfig em0 output -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 240944] em(4): Crash with Intel 82571EB NIC with AMD Piledriver and Steamroller APUs

2021-09-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240944 --- Comment #9 from Ace --- Created attachment 227688 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=227688&action=edit dmesg output -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 240944] em(4): Crash with Intel 82571EB NIC with AMD Piledriver and Steamroller APUs

2021-09-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240944 Kevin Bowling changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kbowl...@freebsd.org --- Comment #

[Bug 240944] em(4): Crash with Intel 82571EB NIC with AMD Piledriver and Steamroller APUs

2021-09-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240944 Ace changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fugkco+freebsd-bugzilla@pro

[Bug 258258] igb - batch creating vlans causes ifconfig %100 cpu usage - dmesg: igbX: Hardware Initialization Failed

2021-09-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=258258 --- Comment #2 from Ozkan KIRIK --- I know that some parts of the igb driver code is common with e1000 (em). So that, I tried same operations with em0 also. There is no such problem exists with e1000 (em0). So that, the bug is related with