https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207087
George V. Neville-Neil changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|g...@freebsd.org |b...@freebsd.org
--
You
To view an individual PR, use:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and ob
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255874
Lutz Donnerhacke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|In Pro
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255874
--- Comment #2 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch main references this bug:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=687e510e5ce32fddf46a9dc1d517ccc8a8e25581
commit 687e510e5ce32fddf46a9dc1d517ccc8a8e25581
Author:
On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 09:18:55PM +1000, Peter Jeremy via freebsd-net wrote:
> This is getting outside my expertise but my understanding is that
> the idea behind using IPv4-mapped addressed is to simplify building
> dual-stack applications, particularly during the early introduction
> of IPv6. T
Hi Patrick,
On 2021-May-14 23:40:04 +0200, "Patrick M. Hausen" wrote:
>do you have some spare time and would you be so kind to look at our discussion
>here: https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome/issues/3015
>
>Andrey from the AdGuard team references this golang issue:
>https://github.com/gol
Hi,
Yes, you are not using emulated netmap mode.
In the test setup depicted here
https://github.com/ftk-ntq/vpp/wiki/VPP-throughput-using-netmap-interfaces#test-setup
I think you should really try to replace VPP with the netmap "bridge"
application (tools/tools/netmap/bridge.c), and see what n
