Thanks,
I wonder that, why RSS and PCBGROUP options are not enabled in GENERIC
kernel by default.
Is there any performance or stability issues?
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 12:26 AM Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On 3/7/21 10:03 PM, Özkan KIRIK wrote:
> > Any suggestions to enable RSS ?
>
> I found tha
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254055
Alexander V. Chernikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|n...@freebsd.org |melif...@freebsd.org
--
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254055
--- Comment #6 from Alexander V. Chernikov ---
Okay, so route6d wants to add /64 network with RTF_HOST flag set and kernel
refuses to do so, as this is inconsistent.
I’ll hopefully get to fix it in the next couple of days.
--
You are rece
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254055
--- Comment #5 from bc...@lafn.org ---
ifconfig bge0 inet6 2001:120::205/64
backup# route -n monitor
got message of size 240 on Sun Mar 7 15:43:44 2021
RTM_ADD: Add Route: len 240, pid: 0, seq 0, errno 0,
flags:
locks: inits:
sockaddr
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254055
Alexander V. Chernikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||melif...@freebsd.org
---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237391
Alexander V. Chernikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|
On 3/7/21 10:03 PM, Özkan KIRIK wrote:
Any suggestions to enable RSS ?
I found that RSS hardware computed checksums are not correct when using
iflib (intel hardware), compared to what the software expects, so
traffic goes on wrong queue and gets dropped simply. Maybe you see
something simila
Hello,
I'm using FreeBSD stable/12 as firewall.
I think RSS is not working properly.
Multiple snort processes are running that one process for each NIC queue.
I've igb and ixgbe NICs.
When number of NIC queues is 8, snort appid detection not working properly.
When number of NIC queues is set to 1,
To view an individual PR, use:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and ob
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254114
--- Comment #2 from Bernhard Froehlich ---
Created attachment 223076
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=223076&action=edit
panic from ifconfig wg0 destroy
On another machine (also 13.0-RC1/amd64) which has slightly d
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254114
Bernhard Froehlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|n...@freebsd.org
--
You are
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254055
--- Comment #3 from bc...@lafn.org ---
That test was run on 13.0-RC1. I upgraded in hopes that might change
something, but it did not.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254055
--- Comment #2 from bc...@lafn.org ---
Here is the -D output from the command: ifconfig ue0 inet6 2001:1010::205/64:
rtmsg:
f0 00 05 01 00 00 00 00 45 04 00 00 03 00 00 00
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00 00 00 00 00 00
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254055
--- Comment #1 from bc...@lafn.org ---
After much testing of the code, the problem is not in the logging directly, but
the log is buffered and there is very little written to it. Adding a fflush
after each printf fixes the logging. However
14 matches
Mail list logo