I've invited you to fill out the following form:
Untitled form
To fill it out, visit:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSedMlWCehKjIbws9onsc78dC7X24iLg3qRGzW0PO8ScL4Y7kA/viewform?vc=0&c=0&w=1&flr=0&usp=mail_form_link
Sehr Begünstigter
Ich schreibe Ihnen, um Sie darüber zu informieren, da
Hi Net
This is sort of an abstract question. When using pf to only preform nat do I
need to have at least one
rule ? Can I omit the boiler plate "scrub rule " ? Other then allowing
fragments and other fun
stuff to get passed would this have any other implications ?
---
Mark Saad
Lucera Fin
scf
can I use polling on sfxge ? Also if I want to use polling on say ix or sfxge
does this break things like pf, bird or nsd ?
---
Mark Saad
Lucera Financial Infrastructures, LLC
ms...@lucera.com
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org on behalf
of Micha
Sorry for the top post. Have you tried device polling? From
/usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/NOTES:
#
# NETWORKING OPTIONS
#
# DEVICE_POLLING adds support for mixed interrupt-polling handling
# of network device drivers, which has si
I have recently upped my Internet service and have now noticed a limit
being reached, but I am not certain which limit and best option to
resolve it.
I am using a circa 2007 system as a multi-purpose router running FreeBSD
12-STABLE (r367740). The issue is that it maxes out around 400Mb/s whe
Hi Rajesh,
I think the issue here is simply that you have not enabled promiscuous
mode on your interfaces.
# ifconfig ix0 promisc
# ifconfig ix1 promisc
This is an additional requirement when using netmap bridge, because that is
not done automatically (differently from what happens with if_bridg
Il giorno ven 20 nov 2020 alle ore 14:31 Rajesh Kumar
ha scritto:
> Hi Vincenzo,
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 3:20 AM Vincenzo Maffione
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Ok, now it makes sense. Thanks for clarifying. I see that if_axp(4) uses
>> iflib(4). This means that actually if_axp(4) has native netmap suppo
