Thanks! This is really great news!
One question though. The status report shows the iwl driver as supporting
"7k/8k/9k/22k" devices. In the insanity of product models vs. chip models
vs. marketing names, is the AX200 one of these?
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
On 26 Jul 2020, at 22:20, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone comment on the state of support for this card? Just having
it
work would be great even if the very nice WiFi 6 features are still
down
the line a bit. It's just really hard to do anything with a laptop
with no
WiFi connectivity.
I know that there is a project to update support for Intel WiFi cards and
it happens that I am looking at a new Lenovo laptop using Ryzen CPUs and
the Intel AX200 WiFi card that should be announced very soon. While there
may be other issues won't be evident until announcement, I might as well
star
Ganbold Tsagaankhuu wrote this message on Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 11:05 +0800:
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 7:13 AM John-Mark Gurney wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'd like people who have ure (RealTek) based USB devices to test
> > review D25809[0].
> >
> > This update adds support for:
> > - HW VLAN tag
To view an individual PR, use:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and ob
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248046
--- Comment #22 from dmilith ---
(In reply to Kristof Provost from comment #21)
Not avoiding or hiding anything. It's exactly same operating system, synced
every 6 hours… (not to mention HBSD patches don't touch anything related to
if_bridg
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248046
--- Comment #21 from Kristof Provost ---
(In reply to dmilith from comment #20)
That's a different operating system...
Don't try to hide that during a bug submission please. It'll always come out in
the end, and you're just wasting both of
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248046
--- Comment #20 from dmilith ---
(In reply to Kristof Provost from comment #19)
https://gist.github.com/dmilith/f6454244f273accf6905f6cba812b3b5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248046
--- Comment #19 from Kristof Provost ---
(In reply to dmilith from comment #17)
**FULL** dmesg, please. You're cutting off part of the panic message, making
this harder than it needs to be.
There may be more things in there that are useful
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248046
--- Comment #18 from dmilith ---
(In reply to Kristof Provost from comment #16)
revision - last available from 16:30 CEST,
branch - stable/12
src.conf - https://github.com/VerKnowSys/svdOS/blob/master/etc/src.conf
make.conf - https://github
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248046
--- Comment #17 from dmilith ---
(In reply to Kristof Provost from comment #16)
I did rebuild again, full command that caused KP:
ifconfig bridge0 create; ifconfig tap0 create; ifconfig tap1 create; ifconfig
bridge0 addm tap0 up; ifconfig
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248046
--- Comment #16 from Kristof Provost ---
(In reply to dmilith from comment #15)
I cannot reproduce that with either scenario.
Please attach full dmesg output, any content of /etc/src.conf or make.conf, any
local patches, content of /etc/sy
Hi net mailing list,
Following the discussion a while ago regarding the import of a DHCPv6
client.
The current state of dhcpcd is such that capsicum and privelege separation
is fully implemented.
How do we move forward with this? I'd really like to see a DHCPv6 client in
base in FreeBSD 13-R
13 matches
Mail list logo
