[Differential] D24937: Add sysctl net.iflib.tx_update_freq to set transmit descriptor update frequency

koobs added a comment. In D24937#560621 , @neel_neelc.org wrote: > I have a new patch making net.iflib.tx_update_freq a sysctl. I attempted to net.iflib.tx_update_freq=32 from 16 (without rebooting!) and it worked. > > Luckily with a brand-n

Re: routed && route6d removal proposal

> 23.06.2020 2:26, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > >> 22.06.2020 19:49, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > >>> Whats unmaintained about code that has no need to change cause it just > >>> pretty much works? > >> Have you actually tried running routed(8) as base for real network with > >> loops, > >> mix of p

Re: Committing a few ipfw(8) patches

> Hi freebsd-net@, > > I'm really sorry if I'm bothering you with emails like this. > > If there are any committers here, I have two patches for the ipfw(8) > subsystem. > > The patches (w/ description & URL) are: > > === > ipfw(8): In fill_ip6(), use a single statement for both "me" and "me6"

[Differential] D24937: Add sysctl net.iflib.tx_update_freq to set transmit descriptor update frequency

neel_neelc.org updated this revision to Diff 73493. neel_neelc.org retitled this revision from "Add readonly tunable net.iflib.tx_update_freq to set transmit descriptor update frequency" to "Add sysctl net.iflib.tx_update_freq to set transmit descriptor update frequency". neel_neelc.org edited th

[Differential] D24937: Add readonly tunable net.iflib.tx_update_freq to set transmit descriptor update frequency

koobs added a comment. Might there be ways to make this run-time tunable, or is it fundamentally not possible even in principle? REPOSITORY rS FreeBSD src repository CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24937/new/ REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24937 E

Committing a few ipfw(8) patches

Hi freebsd-net@, I'm really sorry if I'm bothering you with emails like this. If there are any committers here, I have two patches for the ipfw(8) subsystem. The patches (w/ description & URL) are: === ipfw(8): In fill_ip6(), use a single statement for both "me" and "me6". This prevents unn

[Differential] D24937: Add readonly tunable net.iflib.tx_update_freq to set transmit descriptor update frequency

neel_neelc.org created this revision. neel_neelc.org added a project: network. Herald added subscribers: Contributor Reviews (base), melifaro, ae, imp. Herald added a reviewer: shurd. Herald added a reviewer: iflib. neel_neelc.org requested review of this revision. REVISION SUMMARY Introduce rea

[Bug 238324] Add XG-C100C/AQtion AQC107 10GbE NIC driver

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238324 --- Comment #13 from v...@endrift.com --- I have this NIC on my motherboard but have been too afraid to test it, though I do intend to sometime soon. I have a 10 Gbit switch for it too, but I don't have any 10 Gbit hardware to put on the oth

[Bug 238324] Add XG-C100C/AQtion AQC107 10GbE NIC driver

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238324 Ryan Moeller changed: What|Removed |Added CC||freql...@freebsd.org --- Comment #1

Re: routed && route6d removal proposal

23.06.2020 2:26, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: >> 22.06.2020 19:49, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: >>> Whats unmaintained about code that has no need to change cause it just >>> pretty much works? >> Have you actually tried running routed(8) as base for real network with >> loops, >> mix of p2p and ethernet-

Re: routed && route6d removal proposal

> 22.06.2020 19:49, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > Whats unmaintained about code that has no need to change cause it just > > pretty much works? > > Have you actually tried running routed(8) as base for real network with loops, > mix of p2p and ethernet-like interfaces, IPv4 aliases, need of offs

Re: nfsuserd in a jail

Rick, hello. On 22 Jun 2020, at 16:53, Rick Macklem wrote: > Yes. > (As in, yes it is in 12.1.) Thanks (downtime beckons...!) Best wishes, Norman -- Norman Gray : http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/it/ Research IT Coordinator SUPA School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glas

[Bug 238324] Add XG-C100C/AQtion AQC107 10GbE NIC driver

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238324 Juli Mallett changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jmall...@freebsd.org --- Comment #1

[Bug 206567] [msk] msk0: watchdog timeout - 88E8053 on i386

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206567 --- Comment #14 from Tom Lane --- FTR, I've now had three months of trouble-free uptime on that machine, using hw.msk.msi_disable="1" in /boot/loader.conf. I have not had the time to try Chris' more complex fix. -- You are receiving this

[Bug 238324] Add XG-C100C/AQtion AQC107 10GbE NIC driver

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238324 Matti Viljanen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matti.vilja...@kapsi.fi --- Comme

Re: nfsuserd in a jail

Norman Gray wrote: >There is a 'fixed' bug [1] referring to problems that nfsuserd has, when >working in a jail. > >This appears to explain a problem I'm having getting nfsuserd running >within a jail on a 12.0-RELEASE machine (which I'm aware is now EoL, >since we're beyond 12.1-RELEASE + 3 months

Re: nfsuserd in a jail

Norman Gray wrote: >There is a 'fixed' bug [1] referring to problems that nfsuserd has, when >working in a jail. > >This appears to explain a problem I'm having getting nfsuserd running >within a jail on a 12.0-RELEASE machine (which I'm aware is now EoL, >since we're beyond 12.1-RELEASE + 3 months

nfsuserd in a jail

Greetings. There is a 'fixed' bug [1] referring to problems that nfsuserd has, when working in a jail. This appears to explain a problem I'm having getting nfsuserd running within a jail on a 12.0-RELEASE machine (which I'm aware is now EoL, since we're beyond 12.1-RELEASE + 3 months). Th

RE: SFP I2C interface in drivers (driver SIOCGI2C support)

Hi Alex, I was looking for the SIOCGI2C socket ioctl API, and did not find it in the intel driver. Which led me to believe this was the reason for me not seeing the SFP data. But after correctly looking up the SFP info (the port was in a different jail, which confused me), it turns out that i

Re: routed && route6d removal proposal

"Alexander V. Chernikov" wrote in <273191592779...@mail.yandex.ru>: me> Hey, me> me> I would like to propose removal of sbin/routed and usr.sbin/route6d. I am still using both of them in production environments because they work well at least for my configurations and most of promising alt

Re: net.inet6.ip6.deembed_scopeid removal

"Alexander V. Chernikov" wrote in <645741592773...@mail.yandex.ru>: me> [re-sending email with as non-html] me> me> Hey, me> me> I would like to deprecate net.inet6.ip6.deembed_scopeid sysctl while me> leaving the current default behaviour. me> me> This sysctl controls whether IPv6 scope is emb

Re: routed && route6d removal proposal

22.06.2020 19:49, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > Whats unmaintained about code that has no need to change cause it just pretty > much works? Have you actually tried running routed(8) as base for real network with loops, mix of p2p and ethernet-like interfaces, IPv4 aliases, need of offset-lists and w

Re: routed && route6d removal proposal

> Hey, > > I would like to propose removal of sbin/routed and usr.sbin/route6d. I disagree with removal, as your analysis is flawed. > routed(8) is the daemon implementing RIPv2 routing protocol. > route6d(8) is the daemon implementing RIPng routing protocol for IPv6. > > RIP [1] was one of th

Re: SFP I2C interface in drivers (driver SIOCGI2C support)

22.06.2020, 12:52, "Scheffenegger, Richard" : > Hi, > > I am just curious if anyone is working to get the NIC drivers support to read > the pluggables I2C status (temperature, voltage level, optical power levels) > from Intel NICs and Qlogic CNAs? Hi Richard, which Intel nics you're referring to?

SFP I2C interface in drivers (driver SIOCGI2C support)

Hi, I am just curious if anyone is working to get the NIC drivers support to read the pluggables I2C status (temperature, voltage level, optical power levels) from Intel NICs and Qlogic CNAs? Richard Scheffenegger ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing