On 6/8/20 7:03 AM, Marko Zec wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 15:36:42 +0200
Tom Marcoen wrote:
Hey Jan,
I know about the vast performance improvements with if_bridge(4)
(Thank you, Kristof Provost), the problem with using it for jails is
that once you have a lot of jails, your hosts gets way too ma
On 5/27/20 4:20 AM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
27.05.2020 15:06, Tom Marcoen wrote:
Hey all,
I'm new to this mailing list and also quite new to FreeBSD (huray, welcome
to me!) so bare with me, please.
I'm reading up on Netgraph on how I can integrate it with FreeBSD jails and
I was looking at som
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242406
Mark Johnston changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b...@kobyla.org
--- Comment #8 fro
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242406
--- Comment #7 from Mark Johnston ---
Created attachment 215365
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=215365&action=edit
proposed patch
Please give this patch a try. I believe it will apply cleanly to head or
stable/12
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246748
--- Comment #6 from Neel Chauhan ---
I wrote this patch on CURRENT. You might be able to backport this to 12.1 if
you wanted.
Try applying the patch to 12.1 if you prefer, and if it fails, then try
CURRENT.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242406
Mark Johnston changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ma...@freebsd.org
Stat
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246748
--- Comment #5 from Gert Doering ---
Can I test this with a 12.1-RELEASE source tree, or do I need CURRENT?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-
On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 15:36:42 +0200
Tom Marcoen wrote:
> Hey Jan,
>
> I know about the vast performance improvements with if_bridge(4)
> (Thank you, Kristof Provost), the problem with using it for jails is
> that once you have a lot of jails, your hosts gets way too many epair
> interfaces in its
Hey Jan,
I know about the vast performance improvements with if_bridge(4) (Thank
you, Kristof Provost), the problem with using it for jails is that once you
have a lot of jails, your hosts gets way too many epair interfaces in its
ifconfig, which I really do not like. So I would prefer using Netgr
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246951
--- Comment #9 from freebsd-bugzilla@biscuit.ninja ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #4)
Thank you.
I've attached dmesg.boot output.
This is pfSense so there is no rc.conf. I've attached instead:
- ifconfig output
- interfaces
On 27.05.20 10:06, Tom Marcoen wrote:
Hey all,
I'm new to this mailing list and also quite new to FreeBSD (huray, welcome
to me!) so bare with me, please.
I'm reading up on Netgraph on how I can integrate it with FreeBSD jails and
I was looking at some of the examples provided in
/usr/share/exa
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246951
--- Comment #8 from freebsd-bugzilla@biscuit.ninja ---
Created attachment 215355
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=215355&action=edit
sysctl tunables from pfSense config.xml
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246951
--- Comment #7 from freebsd-bugzilla@biscuit.ninja ---
Created attachment 215354
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=215354&action=edit
interfaces and LAGGs specified in pfSense config.xml
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246951
--- Comment #6 from freebsd-bugzilla@biscuit.ninja ---
Created attachment 215353
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=215353&action=edit
output from the ifconfig command with public ips obfuscated
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246951
--- Comment #5 from freebsd-bugzilla@biscuit.ninja ---
Created attachment 215352
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=215352&action=edit
dmesg.boot written out following the last kernel panic
--
You are receiving this
15 matches
Mail list logo