On 28/11/2019 22:50, Ben Woods wrote:
It is not yet enabled by default until he gets more feedback from others
that it is working ok. I intend to update the FreeBSD port to enable
this feature (perhaps with a “-devel” port) to allow it to be tested
more easily on FreeBSD.
Please add it as a n
Any more opinions please if DNS queries leak information about the internal
network topology and size to the resolver?
It would be interesting to consider 2 separate cases:
1. The internal network is NATed.
2. The internal network is IPv6 with ipv6_privacy="YES"
Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Dear Col
On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 at 9:00 pm, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> Roy Marples wrote
> in :
> ro> Sorry if it was not clear. The discussion involves what is the
> ro> required acceptance for Priviledge Seperation because this is quite
> ro> new to me.
> ro>
> ro> My current idea is to open DHCP, IPv6RA and
SINGLE RELEASE | FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION Gutterprose Records Presents ‘PRIME
TIME’ BY PRIME SINISTER Hi! I found your email and thought this single would be
of interest to you. I would love to start a conversation and hopefully work
with you. ‘Prime Time’ is the first single from ‘Patient Zero’,
On 2019-11-27 18:50, BulkMailForRudy wrote:
iperf3 -c 10.1.1.1 -P 4 ---> 5.1Gbps
I think iperf3 is single-threaded multiple connections. While iperf use
multiple threads
--HPS
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242270
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|n...@freebsd.org
Keywords
