Thank you, Vincenzo.
To anyone else looking this up, 'iperf' is not dependent on the TSO/LRO.
iperf -c 10.1.1.1 -P 4 ---> 9.4Gbps
iperf3 -c 10.1.1.1 -P 4 ---> 5.1Gbps
I still find it odd that the default FreeBSD install has different
options for ix0 and ix1.
Rudy
On 11/23/19 12:5
Unix Codenetworks wrote:
> Hi Victor,
>
> | but I'm damned if I know how to put vxlan to good use.
>
> In term of? Like benefits of using VXLAN in general?
Under FreeBSD, yes.
--
Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/
signature.asc
Description: PGP sig
Hi Victor,
| but I'm damned if I know how to put vxlan to good use.
In term of? Like benefits of using VXLAN in general?
Cheers
Santi
On 2019-11-27 15:25, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Unix Codenetworks wrote:
Hi Victor,
I did mention it, as having VXLAN can allow to integrate FreeBSD as an
Unix Codenetworks wrote:
> Hi Victor,
>
> I did mention it, as having VXLAN can allow to integrate FreeBSD as an
> hypervisor/jails into an VXLAN overlay. Probably there will be some
> other things to sort out, control plane? (depending on deployment type).
These words are too generic.
For e
Hi Victor,
I did mention it, as having VXLAN can allow to integrate FreeBSD as an
hypervisor/jails into an VXLAN overlay. Probably there will be some
other things to sort out, control plane? (depending on deployment type).
I'm not aware of any live deployments running FreeBSD and VXLAN. We d
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242159
--- Comment #1 from Julien Cigar ---
Strangely enough I would add that the problem doesn't occur on my work machine
(Thinkpad P52s) with (almost) the same card:
em0@pci0:0:31:6:class=0x02 card=0x225a17aa chip=0x15d88086 rev=0x2
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220468
yama...@kbh.biglobe.ne.jp changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yama...@kbh.biglobe.ne.j
